Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Se-Tenant and Catalog Value  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1128 Posts
Posted 07/23/2011   10:39 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add ncbuckeye to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
In a discussion with a local youth who collects stamps, he posed this question. Hw was looking at the 2009 edition of the U.S. Postal Service Guide to Stamps which uses Scott numbers and values. Some of the early se-tenant issues (examples are 1972 1456-1459 and 1973 1480-1483) have the uncancelled joined block of 4 with a lower value than each of the 4 stamps separated. He asked if he should separate his block of 4 so that the stamps would be worth more! I understand that Scott's places a 20 cent minimum on a single issue, but it would seem logical to me that for a se-tenant issue, the whole should always be equal to at least the sum of the parts! Oh, yes, I convinced him to keep as a block of 4.
Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12120 Posts
Posted 07/23/2011   12:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The Postal Service Guide to US Stamps is based on the Scott Catalog, and the Scott Catalog does indeed show lower values for many blocks and/or se-tenant set of stamps than they do for each stamp separated individually. In fact, there are even situations where some of these modern blocks of stamps are worth more used than mint! Not that the stamps are particularly valuable, but many multiples were saved by collectors in mint form and few saw postal use. However, if you tried to use those stamps today, they would probably be worth less as the term "used" typically applies to contemporaneous cancellations and not cancels that were applied 10, 20 or 30 years later.

The stamps you recite are from the early 1970's and to take the issue to the extreme, look at the 2-cent National Parks Centennial stamps (Scott 1448-51). As each separated stamp is given a minimum catalog value of 20 cents, you would think a block of four would be worth 80 cents, but in fact it's assigned catalog number 1451a and only worth a mere 25 cents!

The reality is that catalog values aren't meant to give a true value to a common stamp. The minimum catalog value takes into account a dealer's cost to maintain his store, and his overhead, and his cost to keep on-hand the inventory of stamps a collector may want. In most cases stamps sell for much less. It's all supply and demand. If a collector needs one or two stamps to fill spaces in his album, no matter how common, he may be willing to buy it above catalog value simply to accomplish his goal while others may wait until the stamp is found at a deep discount.

The other issue to consider is that in dealing with a used stamp that may have a catalog minimum of 20 cents, most will know that the re-sale will probably be a couple of cents (if that); just because someone may have accumulated 10,000 copies of that same used stamp, doesn't mean that you can apply a $2000 value to it; as they will still only sell for pennies.

That's why catalogs are often referred to as a "Guide" Just because an item may be listed as being worth a set amount doesn't mean it's worth that on the resale market. The true value all comes down to what a buyer is willing to pay and what a seller is willing to accept to make the deal go through.

An analogy I use quite often is that you can go into a new car showroom and see the perfect car with a $30,000 sticker price but few would expect to pay that, as most would want a discount and a rebate and any other promotional incentive to get the car at far less than list (catalog) price may suggest. Same general principle holds true for stamps or coins or antiques or any other item of value.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts
Posted 07/23/2011   12:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add I_Love_Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Very well put wt1. That cleared up some questions I have had about this topic. So, thanx.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum Topics Recently Active Forum Topics
  QV #18 major re-entry position 94
  Australia kangaroo (variation) ??
  some help to identified this type of stamp
  Germany - help with identification
  Does anyone know how ....
  russia 18?? 7k Arms of Russia, double headed eagle error
  Video Exhibit - Greco-Turk War
  Giveaway: 2014 Scotts US Pocket Catalogue
  KUT George VI registration 30c label
  Russia 5k 1864 Double headed eagle color ( error ) ؟؟
  Looking for some help for some old and very rare stamps
  Avatar face lift, please
  German stamp from 1948 Hannover
  Korean War C.F.P.O. 26 Dates ??
  Killer wavy bar cancel question???
  A change in perspective...
  Postage due covers, generally
  Is this a true 388 - oversaturation on scan?
  2 blue Mauritius and Heidelberg presses
  sleepy hollow halloween cover
  china junks stamps! owerprinted 1 ct
  570 color error? US 50 cent stamp
  NFLD - Scott 72 shifted "W"
  APS Disciplinary Actions trend

  QV #18 major re-entry position 94
  Digital Initiatives - a more realistic/pessimistic view
  What Did You Do Philatelically: Today or Recently?
  Where did you get the most stamps from last year?
  The Stamps of Turkey : On Steiner Pages.
  Collecting by Engraver
  some help to identified this type of stamp
  Going ape
  Australia kangaroo (variation) ??
  Hands On Stamps
  Let's see your cinderellas!
  Video Exhibit - Greco-Turk War
  Looking for some help for some old and very rare stamps
  Does anyone know how ....
  Do you have scans of any of the varieties I need?
  Scott #909-21 Over Run Countries PLATE BLOCK SET of 13
  New Canadian "Kiosk" Stamps
  My search for QEII errors continues....
  More Cats on Stamps
  Lock Seals?
  Scott # 372 Sheet (1909 Huron)
  Germany - help with identification
  Mountains and Volcanos on Stamps
  Railway (Train) Stations on Stamps

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2016 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2014 Stamp Community Forums Go To Top Of Page
It took 0.23 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05