Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Se-Tenant and Catalog Value  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1128 Posts
Posted 07/23/2011   10:39 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add ncbuckeye to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
In a discussion with a local youth who collects stamps, he posed this question. Hw was looking at the 2009 edition of the U.S. Postal Service Guide to Stamps which uses Scott numbers and values. Some of the early se-tenant issues (examples are 1972 1456-1459 and 1973 1480-1483) have the uncancelled joined block of 4 with a lower value than each of the 4 stamps separated. He asked if he should separate his block of 4 so that the stamps would be worth more! I understand that Scott's places a 20 cent minimum on a single issue, but it would seem logical to me that for a se-tenant issue, the whole should always be equal to at least the sum of the parts! Oh, yes, I convinced him to keep as a block of 4.
Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12120 Posts
Posted 07/23/2011   12:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The Postal Service Guide to US Stamps is based on the Scott Catalog, and the Scott Catalog does indeed show lower values for many blocks and/or se-tenant set of stamps than they do for each stamp separated individually. In fact, there are even situations where some of these modern blocks of stamps are worth more used than mint! Not that the stamps are particularly valuable, but many multiples were saved by collectors in mint form and few saw postal use. However, if you tried to use those stamps today, they would probably be worth less as the term "used" typically applies to contemporaneous cancellations and not cancels that were applied 10, 20 or 30 years later.

The stamps you recite are from the early 1970's and to take the issue to the extreme, look at the 2-cent National Parks Centennial stamps (Scott 1448-51). As each separated stamp is given a minimum catalog value of 20 cents, you would think a block of four would be worth 80 cents, but in fact it's assigned catalog number 1451a and only worth a mere 25 cents!

The reality is that catalog values aren't meant to give a true value to a common stamp. The minimum catalog value takes into account a dealer's cost to maintain his store, and his overhead, and his cost to keep on-hand the inventory of stamps a collector may want. In most cases stamps sell for much less. It's all supply and demand. If a collector needs one or two stamps to fill spaces in his album, no matter how common, he may be willing to buy it above catalog value simply to accomplish his goal while others may wait until the stamp is found at a deep discount.

The other issue to consider is that in dealing with a used stamp that may have a catalog minimum of 20 cents, most will know that the re-sale will probably be a couple of cents (if that); just because someone may have accumulated 10,000 copies of that same used stamp, doesn't mean that you can apply a $2000 value to it; as they will still only sell for pennies.

That's why catalogs are often referred to as a "Guide" Just because an item may be listed as being worth a set amount doesn't mean it's worth that on the resale market. The true value all comes down to what a buyer is willing to pay and what a seller is willing to accept to make the deal go through.

An analogy I use quite often is that you can go into a new car showroom and see the perfect car with a $30,000 sticker price but few would expect to pay that, as most would want a discount and a rebate and any other promotional incentive to get the car at far less than list (catalog) price may suggest. Same general principle holds true for stamps or coins or antiques or any other item of value.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts
Posted 07/23/2011   12:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add I_Love_Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Very well put wt1. That cleared up some questions I have had about this topic. So, thanx.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum Topics Recently Active Forum Topics
  I think I may have stumbled upon a 482A...
  Reunion question. Close Cross Version?
  Netherlands Stamp Giveaway
  1965-1981 Prominent American Series Scott Numbers?
  confusing to a beginner?
  Australian Butterflies and Moths 1981 - 2016
  Is Australia Post Increasing the International $2.75c stamp?
  Strange Stamp Or Label Found in my European Stamp Collection?
  Custom avatar request
  British Solomon Island postage due cover
  Stamp Mount Organization
  Bermuda 1949 6d UPU Block of 6 Mint
  577 Schermack strip of 4 paste up. Real?
  Scott 5A on eBay - OG - can't be legit can it?
  ATA Princess Diana stamp list
  Newfoundland 1897 Cover with Railway postmark
  Number of unused/mint u.s. first issue revenues?
  Chinese stamps that I think is a long enough title for this post
  Scott 1756 - Cloud in the sky
  A Pomeroy & Co. express label
  P. R. of China 2016 "Seasons Fruit" issue:
  UK stamp 1955/56 Elisabeth II HELP
  Looking to add to the pre-1940 part of my USA collection and need vendor recommendations
  State of the Hobby Today
  French Polynesia Registration Label

  USPS searching for the mail truck of the future
  Looking to add to the pre-1940 part of my USA collection and need vendor recommendations
  I think I may have stumbled upon a 482A...
  Album recomendations please
  Need help with Scott 18 to 24 stamps
  Netherlands Stamp Giveaway
  Reunion question. Close Cross Version?
  A Pomeroy & Co. express label
  A rather special Niagara cover
  Bats on Stamps?
  confusing to a beginner?
  Need help with one cent washington despatch stamp
  1800's Local Stamps
  Kochersperger Penny Post stamp
  Tasmanian Pictorials 1899 - 1912
  Scott 5A on eBay - OG - can't be legit can it?
  USPS Philatelic Products which are sold out fast!
  Austrian Souvenir Sheets
  Cover Calendar for month and day -PICS
  France Revenue stamps
  The Stamps of Turkey : On Steiner Pages.
  ATA Princess Diana stamp list
  VF stamps , this seller is a joke
  State of the Hobby Today
  Help with France stamps

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2016 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2014 Stamp Community Forums Go To Top Of Page
It took 0.23 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05