Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Southington, CT Precancel Question  
 

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12127 Posts
Posted 03/01/2013   09:43 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
I happened to come across this document when web surfing the internet recently. Can anyone tell me if this means that such postmarks from Southington, CT are really precancels or is it one of those areas where there is really "no way to tell" since the same markings would likely have been used on other pieces of mail?

Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
2733 Posts
Posted 03/01/2013   11:03 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add warrehouse to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Fun & Interesting, The Postmaster seemed pretty reserved with Mr Ball!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
87 Posts
Posted 03/01/2013   1:06 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Oregonian to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I believe these are the electro-plate the postmaster was speaking of, so his "allowance" was granted at some point these are one the Perf 12 1922 series, so one has to ask where was the device in 1935?

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12127 Posts
Posted 03/01/2013   2:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
If I read the Postmaster's letter correctly, he indicated that he had the device in 1935, but Washington would not give him the required allowance needed to have the precancel professionally printed, so the alternative was to use the handstamps shown.

As I suggested earlier, it seems to me that the use of those "handstamps" may have effectively created a precancel that served the purposes needed for that year, but for precancel collectors there would be no way to identify if those "handstamps" were legitimately used as a precancel unless the example were collected on cover. In other words, an example of a stamp soaked off paper with the above postmarks would be impossible to identify as a legitimate precancel. Probably the very reason why the PSS catalogs do not recognize it as a listed variety (or varieties).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
87 Posts
Posted 03/01/2013   2:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Oregonian to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Shame on me, I did read that the wrong way. Now I wonder why the PO lost it's "allowance" and resorted to a handstamp provincial, and I wonder if the precancels catalog Gods would use this letter to justify listing it as a legit precancel and not a provincial?
Mike
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1951 Posts
Posted 03/01/2013   3:54 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add chasa to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The Gods [aka the gatekeepers] will not allow it in the PSS T&T catalog [aka the BIBLE].
One problem with it is that they were not used exclusively for precancelling - and that is usually the rationale for excluding these locally improvised cancellers. The fact that it EVER was used in a precancelling context is not sufficient.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum Topics Recently Active Forum Topics
  Singapore SG85? equal Scott 57b?
  Gunshot wound freak? I cannot tell.
  Canada: New Star Trek Stamps
  After 15 years I lost the enjoyment
  NFR17 perf 12 - Anyone recognize this part-perfin?
  Unlisted paper variety of an official seal
  Help wpth Postage Due shades.
  2016 Chester on Track Event Cover - Massachusetts MA - CSX B&A Conrail Railroad
  VATICAN CITY Scott 110-121 Catholic Reformers Set 1946
  German Occupation set- What am I Missing?
  Subway Stamp Shop -- Website and Wished-for Products
  Hodge Podge of stamps I need help identifying
  1875-88 canada registration stamp F1 (i cannot determine color)? org,vermilion or rose carmine?
  Scott # 35 major re-entry (Sc 35XX) ?
  What is an "Internal Tear"??
  What's not to like about gators?
  The Stamps of Kyrgyzstan.
  How often do you gaze upon?
  Australian Penny Red
  Purchased this cover today at thrift store!
  QR6 Quebec registration stamp - Need second opinion.
  Where Do Mint Postage Due Stamps Come From???
  Recommendation re: good UV lights?
  Need help identifying stamp
  Tasmania Cancellation

  Singapore SG85? equal Scott 57b?
  Canada: New Star Trek Stamps
  Unlisted paper variety of an official seal
  More philatelic butchery
  Gunshot wound freak? I cannot tell.
  Stamp Smarter April Contest
  Paper Thickness for reference
  Whats in your Library?
  Food on Stamps!
  1c 1851 Plate 3 Stamps
  Subway Stamp Shop -- Website and Wished-for Products
  Scanner Problems
  Show me! MUSIC / Musicians/ Instruments
  Husbands and Wives Pictured Together on Postage Stamps
  After 15 years I lost the enjoyment
  Album Pages on GermanStamps.net
  Tasmania Cancellation
  Australian Penny Red
  Need help identifying stamp
  Urban Legends of Philately
  Rainbows
  NFR17 perf 12 - Anyone recognize this part-perfin?
  Expertizing Berlin Overprints
  Scott # 35 major re-entry (Sc 35XX) ?
  Going through family collection

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2017 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2014 Stamp Community Forums Go To Top Of Page
It took 0.34 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05