Stamp Community Family of Web Sites  
  United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!Newly Listed Buy it Now Listings on eBay!
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!
 All Forums
 General Philatelic Discussions (Non Country Specific)
 Precancels
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register. 

Southington, CT Precancel Question

Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

wt1
Bedrock Of The Community


United States
10342 Posts

Posted 03/01/2013  09:43 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message

I happened to come across this document when web surfing the internet recently. Can anyone tell me if this means that such postmarks from Southington, CT are really precancels or is it one of those areas where there is really "no way to tell" since the same markings would likely have been used on other pieces of mail?

Send note to staff

warrehouse
Pillar Of The Community


United States
2614 Posts

Posted 03/01/2013  11:03 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add warrehouse to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Fun & Interesting, The Postmaster seemed pretty reserved with Mr Ball!

Send note to staff Go to Top of Page

Oregonian
Valued Member
56 Posts

Posted 03/01/2013  1:06 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Oregonian to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

I believe these are the electro-plate the postmaster was speaking of, so his "allowance" was granted at some point these are one the Perf 12 1922 series, so one has to ask where was the device in 1935?



Send note to staff Go to Top of Page

wt1
Bedrock Of The Community


United States
10342 Posts

Posted 03/01/2013  2:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

If I read the Postmaster's letter correctly, he indicated that he had the device in 1935, but Washington would not give him the required allowance needed to have the precancel professionally printed, so the alternative was to use the handstamps shown.

As I suggested earlier, it seems to me that the use of those "handstamps" may have effectively created a precancel that served the purposes needed for that year, but for precancel collectors there would be no way to identify if those "handstamps" were legitimately used as a precancel unless the example were collected on cover. In other words, an example of a stamp soaked off paper with the above postmarks would be impossible to identify as a legitimate precancel. Probably the very reason why the PSS catalogs do not recognize it as a listed variety (or varieties).

Send note to staff Go to Top of Page

Oregonian
Valued Member
56 Posts

Posted 03/01/2013  2:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Oregonian to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Shame on me, I did read that the wrong way. Now I wonder why the PO lost it's "allowance" and resorted to a handstamp provincial, and I wonder if the precancels catalog Gods would use this letter to justify listing it as a legit precancel and not a provincial?
Mike

Send note to staff Go to Top of Page

chasa
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1161 Posts

Posted 03/01/2013  3:54 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add chasa to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

The Gods [aka the gatekeepers] will not allow it in the PSS T&T catalog [aka the BIBLE].
One problem with it is that they were not used exclusively for precancelling - and that is usually the rationale for excluding these locally improvised cancellers. The fact that it EVER was used in a precancelling context is not sufficient.

Send note to staff Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum Topics Recently Active Forum Topics


Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2014 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2011 Stamp Community Forums Go To Top Of Page
It took 0.19 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05