Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Southington, CT Precancel Question  
 

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12120 Posts
Posted 03/01/2013   09:43 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
I happened to come across this document when web surfing the internet recently. Can anyone tell me if this means that such postmarks from Southington, CT are really precancels or is it one of those areas where there is really "no way to tell" since the same markings would likely have been used on other pieces of mail?

Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
2733 Posts
Posted 03/01/2013   11:03 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add warrehouse to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Fun & Interesting, The Postmaster seemed pretty reserved with Mr Ball!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
87 Posts
Posted 03/01/2013   1:06 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Oregonian to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I believe these are the electro-plate the postmaster was speaking of, so his "allowance" was granted at some point these are one the Perf 12 1922 series, so one has to ask where was the device in 1935?

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12120 Posts
Posted 03/01/2013   2:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
If I read the Postmaster's letter correctly, he indicated that he had the device in 1935, but Washington would not give him the required allowance needed to have the precancel professionally printed, so the alternative was to use the handstamps shown.

As I suggested earlier, it seems to me that the use of those "handstamps" may have effectively created a precancel that served the purposes needed for that year, but for precancel collectors there would be no way to identify if those "handstamps" were legitimately used as a precancel unless the example were collected on cover. In other words, an example of a stamp soaked off paper with the above postmarks would be impossible to identify as a legitimate precancel. Probably the very reason why the PSS catalogs do not recognize it as a listed variety (or varieties).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
87 Posts
Posted 03/01/2013   2:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Oregonian to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Shame on me, I did read that the wrong way. Now I wonder why the PO lost it's "allowance" and resorted to a handstamp provincial, and I wonder if the precancels catalog Gods would use this letter to justify listing it as a legit precancel and not a provincial?
Mike
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1806 Posts
Posted 03/01/2013   3:54 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add chasa to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The Gods [aka the gatekeepers] will not allow it in the PSS T&T catalog [aka the BIBLE].
One problem with it is that they were not used exclusively for precancelling - and that is usually the rationale for excluding these locally improvised cancellers. The fact that it EVER was used in a precancelling context is not sufficient.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum Topics Recently Active Forum Topics
  Are these selllers for real...?
  Scott 469 - Canadian pavilion
  New Collector Looking for Trades
  Australia FDCs 1965-1978 - anything to look out for?
  Austrian $ 4,400 with a lot of stamps not ID properly
  Postal convention between the Papal States and the United States
  "Seebeck Reprints" One of the Rarest Stamps in the World?
  Looking for giveaway ideas
  Bureau Precancel Albums
  Unused Germany Stampsv
  Help with ID of 2c Natl Park
  Scott 192 - Sharing a varietiy.
  Scott C2 Canada air stamp
  Scott #233a Blue Error
  US White Ace - missing page 508
  Canada: Small Queens 3c Timeline
  H.E. Harris stamp albums
  Covers from Stamp Dealers 60 Years Ago
  Missing 'invert' comment - topic
  Scott Catalogue 2013 was digital?
  Danish stamps - Scott # 6
  If you use Michel, what % of CV is your rule of thumb?
  Worldwide online stamp dealer with scans
  More From The Collection...
  Pretty Little Cover...

  Unique US 220b (with PF cert) eBay auction - thoughts?
  More Cats on Stamps
  need help IDing one austrian perfin
  Are these selllers for real...?
  NHL stamps to be issued in September 2016
  Pottery, Ceramics, Porcelain, and other clayware
  If you use Michel, what % of CV is your rule of thumb?
  Scott 469 - Canadian pavilion
  "Seebeck Reprints" One of the Rarest Stamps in the World?
  One cent Franklin, Opinions "Laid Paper"?
  Statues on Stamps
  Austrian $ 4,400 with a lot of stamps not ID properly
  New Collector Looking for Trades
  confusing to a beginner?
  H.E. Harris stamp albums
  State of the Hobby Today
  Show Us Your BIG CATS on stamps!
  Any interest in world Postal Stationery?
  Big blue 1840-1940 scott album opinions
  More From The Collection...
  Australia FDCs 1965-1978 - anything to look out for?
  Covers from Stamp Dealers 60 Years Ago
  Looking for giveaway ideas
  Looking to add to the pre-1940 part of my USA collection and need vendor recommendations
  Art & Paintings on Stamps

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2016 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2014 Stamp Community Forums Go To Top Of Page
It took 0.25 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05