Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Warning from Canada Post  
 

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Valued Member
Canada
276 Posts
Posted 09/08/2010   03:49 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add XNBer to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
Canada Post is warning people about re-using stamps.

Inside the new mental health Permanent + 10 cent booklets, issued Sept 7/10, the warning in French and English says "It is unlawful to remove and attempt to reuse postage stamps"

Not that any of us would do such a dastardly deed........I'm thinking CP would lose a lot of money on legal fees taking somebody to court on such a charge.

I would guess that good lawyer (is that a juxtaposition of terms?) would have few problems defending anybody caught not obeying this rule.

I know this topic has been mentioned here before; but, it is the first time I've seen the warning on booklets.

Send note to Staff

Rest in Peace
Canada
6750 Posts
Posted 09/08/2010   08:03 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Puzzler to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks XNBer. I noticed that on the joint Israel issue a bit earlier and someone said it had been on some definitive booklets before.

I wonder if they are getting ready to crack down more on this? As you say, it would be bard but they may just pick a few example cases to make a point. I wouldn't think it would be a good time for them to have any bad publicity though.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1259 Posts
Posted 09/08/2010   09:42 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add djd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Good morning everyone

Quote:
I wouldn't think it would be a good time for them to have any bad publicity though.

it was a few years ago when someone in the P.O. said publicly.

Quote:
"the public be damned"
or was it the Union president responding to all the criticism about the many strikes we had in the seventies and early eighties.
Doug
I think you could be right,they could make a landmark case out of one or two individuals.
David -Better hide my "Glue stick" specials.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
305 Posts
Posted 09/08/2010   10:58 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Gaff to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I had thought that they would return the letter to sender if postage was insufficient (whether from trying to reuse postage or other reasons) or that they would send through, with postage due to be collected by the recipient.

Does anyone know of any instances in postal history where fraudulent reuse has occurred on a large scale resulting in legal action?

thanks.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Israel
6079 Posts
Posted 09/09/2010   08:24 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Londonbus1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Not that any of us would do such a dastardly deed


I do !

I will try to find the other threads explaining why I do...and why tens of thousands of others do to.

If I cannot find it, I will explain anew.

Londonbus1
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Israel
6079 Posts
Posted 09/09/2010   08:36 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Londonbus1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Here is one such 'Londonbus rant' from a recent topic.
It was probably a little out of place on that one but once I get going.....

http://www.stampcommunity.org/topic...OPIC_ID=9200
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
USA
3315 Posts
Posted 09/09/2010   4:59 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add laswabbie to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
There's nothing better on a boring afternoon at work than a great 'classic' rant. Way to go Michael, and I agree.

Stamps get reused because the postal services are too - lazy, stupid, arrogant, incompetent - to cancel them. You may use one or more to fill in the blank.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
1354 Posts
Posted 09/09/2010   5:12 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stampgal to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Is there any way for the POs to tell if a stamp has been "postally used" if it has not been cancelled?
If not, then surely you could claim that you "stuck the stamp on the envelope but then changed my mind and so soaked it off and stuck it on another envelope with a gluestick"?
(Just working on my defence in case I ever get caught).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Canada
276 Posts
Posted 09/10/2010   04:26 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add XNBer to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Well, somebody......and that somebody is somebody who probably hasn't read this thread, has double-thwarted me from ever re-using a stamp.

First: several dollars worth of properly canceled Canadian stamps were on a stamp-related package I received Sept 9th.

Second: many of those stamps included a good smattering of higher value denominations from the past 40 or 50 years AND THEY WERE COVERED WITH CLEAR PACKING-TAPE.

I don't mind that I can't reuse stamps that were properly canceled......that's the luck of the draw, should I ever decide to throw caution to the wind and risk prosecution, prison and/or punishment.

But, there were a few nice ones on the package that have a CV of more than the usual 20 cents each IF THEY HAD NOT BEEN COVERED WITH CLEAR TAPE.

Imagine my tears of frustration.

I'm afraid I know the answer to the following question........but, on the off-chance I've missed another world-shattering scientific discovery, has anybody come up with a way of cleanly removing the aforementioned clear (Scotch) tape from the face of stamps?

Yes, I realize this topic possibly should be under another heading; but, I just want to throw it out there while I'm in a ranting mood.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Israel
6079 Posts
Posted 09/10/2010   04:42 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Londonbus1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
AND THEY WERE COVERED WITH CLEAR PACKING-TAPE.


Disgraceful !

They were probably too lazy to use a gluestick so they used Cellotape instead.

As for soaking it off, it's a bit hit and miss and some damage will occur. There are threads here, will have to check, but lighter fuel will get it off sometimes and so will White Spirit and Vodka [not together]. But they are all hit and miss.

Try searching for the other threads on this topic.

Londonbus1
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
USA
2421 Posts
Posted 09/10/2010   9:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add modern_who to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I would guess that good lawyer (is that a juxtaposition of terms?) would have few problems defending anybody caught not obeying this rule.


Just wondering, how so?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page


Larry, APS Member

Modern-Vue Stamps on eBay
Valued Member
Canada
276 Posts
Posted 09/12/2010   8:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add XNBer to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I think it would be a real chore for the Post Office to prove somebody reused a stamp.

It probably would require testimony from somebody who actually saw the act occur.

Then, there's the problem of proving intent etc......all too much for the expense involved.

But, if CP wanted to make an example of somebody for whatever reason, it could happen.

And, if you are questioning whether "good lawyer" is a juxtaposition of terms.......I won't go there.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum Topics Recently Active Forum Topics
  Are these selllers for real...?
  Scott 469 - Canadian pavilion
  New Collector Looking for Trades
  Australia FDCs 1965-1978 - anything to look out for?
  Austrian $ 4,400 with a lot of stamps not ID properly
  Postal convention between the Papal States and the United States
  "Seebeck Reprints" One of the Rarest Stamps in the World?
  Looking for giveaway ideas
  Bureau Precancel Albums
  Unused Germany Stampsv
  Help with ID of 2c Natl Park
  Scott 192 - Sharing a varietiy.
  Scott C2 Canada air stamp
  Scott #233a Blue Error
  US White Ace - missing page 508
  Canada: Small Queens 3c Timeline
  H.E. Harris stamp albums
  Covers from Stamp Dealers 60 Years Ago
  Missing 'invert' comment - topic
  Scott Catalogue 2013 was digital?
  Danish stamps - Scott # 6
  If you use Michel, what % of CV is your rule of thumb?
  Worldwide online stamp dealer with scans
  More From The Collection...
  Pretty Little Cover...

  Any interest in world Postal Stationery?
  One cent Franklin, Opinions "Laid Paper"?
  ATA Princess Diana stamp list
  "Seebeck Reprints" One of the Rarest Stamps in the World?
  National Park Postcards.
  Covers from Stamp Dealers 60 Years Ago
  State of the Hobby Today
  need help IDing one austrian perfin
  Stamps of Small Animals / Mammals / Fauna
  Unique US 220b (with PF cert) eBay auction - thoughts?
  More Cats on Stamps
  Are these selllers for real...?
  NHL stamps to be issued in September 2016
  Pottery, Ceramics, Porcelain, and other clayware
  If you use Michel, what % of CV is your rule of thumb?
  Scott 469 - Canadian pavilion
  Statues on Stamps
  Austrian $ 4,400 with a lot of stamps not ID properly
  New Collector Looking for Trades
  confusing to a beginner?
  H.E. Harris stamp albums
  Show Us Your BIG CATS on stamps!
  Big blue 1840-1940 scott album opinions
  More From The Collection...
  Australia FDCs 1965-1978 - anything to look out for?

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2016 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2014 Stamp Community Forums Go To Top Of Page
It took 0.92 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05