Quote:
I think a State Bicentennial is exactly the type of thing that is worthy of a commemorative stamp.
Now if you'd like to debate the stamp-worthiness of shirts, bicycles, and weather vanes, then I share your concerns.
We're definitely on the same page. I was not disputing the worth of the Louisiana State Stamp as a subject matter. As a matter of fact, the Louisiana Stamp is very attractive and is certainly a good representation of a continuing series of stamps for all of the State bicentennials.
My concern is with the sheer number of stamps that are slated to be issued in 2012 that make the ability to collect all issues to be well beyond the budget of many collectors.
In fact, I cannot understand the reason why the Louisiana State Stamp wasn't in the initial "Beyond the Perf" introduction of 2012 stamps when they were announced a couple of months ago. Why did this one have to be announced separately? Come to think of it, the USPS did the same thing when announcing the Arizona State Stamp. Maybe it has something to do with the slow movement of the State governments in endorsing the subject matter and/or design to appear on the stamp, as opposed to a generic stamp featuring a landmark or historical figure.
In any event, I mentioned in an earlier post that there is yet another Forever stamp slated to be announced in early December, which adds even more cost to the 2012 Stamp Release Schedule.
I seem to recall hearing that one of the goals of the USPS in reversing their financial difficulty, was in retailing more stamps and merchandise to the consumer, so maybe that has something to do with it. Of course, it can also backfire and result in too many collectors walking away from collecting new issues altogether, which will do little for the USPS's bottom line.