Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

#64 Pink I Think? Plus Cert-Ingram Question

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 1,396Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
254 Posts
Posted 04/08/2017   6:03 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Daveinva47 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I think the stamp in the photos is a #64 pink. I picture the envelope with it, because I watched the stamp fall off the envelope....so I (emphasis on I) know it was attached, but...and you can see the bleed through of the pen cancel on the envelope. Thoughts on if it is a #64?
Which leads to second questions......should I get it certified? How does one go about doing that?

Thanks in advance!

Dave







Send note to Staff

Valued Member
United States
254 Posts
Posted 04/08/2017   6:04 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Daveinva47 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Title should have said CERT-ING questions (darn autocorrect!)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
5011 Posts
Posted 04/08/2017   6:43 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The 64/65 stamp in released in mid August 1861, Thus this cover would have to be 1862 or after. Texas is in Confederacy in July 1862, 1863, and 1864. So the earliest this can be is 1865. This is well after the fall 1861 pink era. Yours is a normal Scott 65.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
82 Posts
Posted 04/08/2017   7:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wbrob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
That is a rather scarce postmark. The PO was in operation from
1848 to 1877. If the cover can be gently cleaned, pressed etc. and the stamp carefully replaced, you will have a desirable cover.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
254 Posts
Posted 04/08/2017   10:42 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Daveinva47 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks John and Wbrob. As a matter of fact the letter inside is dated 1868. But I'm having trouble calling it a #65, the color is entirely different from what I have that I'm calling a 65. It's much lighter. Plus I'm not convinced someone could have gotten some of the #64's when they were issued, Texas being in the confederacy or not.
Anybody else have an opinion?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2509 Posts
Posted 04/08/2017   11:00 pm  Show Profile Check sinclair2010's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add sinclair2010 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Nobody here is going to call it a #64 from that image, plus, an 1868 usage makes it all but impossible. You have a nice Texas cover there, leave it at that.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
254 Posts
Posted 04/09/2017   07:54 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Daveinva47 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks. I got a little out in front of my skis on this one.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1660 Posts
Posted 04/09/2017   1:42 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dudley to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Dave, the genuine #64 has an almost bluish cast to it, which your stamp does not (it is simply faded, I think). Go to the Philatelic Foundation website at http://www.philatelicfoundation.org and search on Scott #64 and you'll see some good examples.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by dudley - 04/09/2017 7:24 pm
Valued Member
United States
254 Posts
Posted 04/09/2017   6:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Daveinva47 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Dudley....again, I let myself get out over my skis and I should have just gone with what everyone was saying.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2626 Posts
Posted 04/10/2017   11:23 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add txstamp to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yea, that Texas cover is way more interesting than that stamp ever will be (probably). Texas postal history - it seems like a lot of the material is often ugly, but it is very collectible, and uncommon. So hang on to that cover. Someone will want it someday, when you are done with it.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 1,396Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2023 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2023 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.58 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05