Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

US Gutter Pairs Of Benjamin Franklin One Cent Green And George Washington 2 Cent Carmine

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 25 / Views: 3,205Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
United States
181 Posts
Posted 04/20/2017   08:43 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Lioness2 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi littleriverPhil. yes, I did and both are 3mmm.in width above.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2745 Posts
Posted 04/20/2017   08:50 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Ah, thought so, the center margin looked wider the margins on the outer sides of the pairs.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
181 Posts
Posted 04/20/2017   10:03 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Lioness2 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
That is why when I viewed them I had considered them gutters due to width being larger than normal pairs. It can be also viewed in the visual comparison with the "Harding pairs". The width is larger than the pair he has in his possession too.
Thank you for your great observation. I have been told in past, they are special stamps.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2745 Posts
Posted 04/20/2017   10:11 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It is odd, they are listed as 3mm but have no sub lettering or numbers.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1157 Posts
Posted 04/20/2017   8:25 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The #343 pair, with 3mm spacing, is from a "Star" plate, from the outer 6 rows on the sheet of 100. There were issues with shrinkage causing miss-perforation with the 3rd. bureau issues. They were first issued with uniform 2mm spacing, which was deemed unsatisfactory (causing miss-perforation issues, causing too much waste). These first plates were plate numbered along with the Bureau of Engraving and Printing logo. The spacing was changed to 3mm for the outer 6 rows and 2mm for the 4 inner rows on each of the 100 (10x10 rows) sheets in the 4 sheet printing format. This change was given a small open star, plate number, and bureau logo. There is also one sheet of #343 from plate #4980 with a small solid star that has the same spacing as stated above. This spacing caused problems for the private vending and affixing machine manufacturers who required equal spacing between rows on unperforated sheet stamps to work in their machines. Finally a 2.75mm even spacing was used. These sheets had an "A", followed by the plate number then the Bureau logo. As the first plates and the stared plates were retired, the remaining plate produced with 2.75mm spacing dropped the "A" from the plate number. The "A" plates were not used for #343; they were used on #383. I think I got this right. If not, someone with correct me.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Al E. Gator - 04/20/2017 8:27 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2745 Posts
Posted 04/20/2017   11:07 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Whew! As if W/F issues aren't complicated enough! So, ideally one would want strips showing both 2 mm and 3 mm margins. Easier to find the star plate number.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
181 Posts
Posted 04/20/2017   11:48 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Lioness2 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Excellent information Al. I do believe your information is correct from what I read in the past. Thank you for sharing it in the forum.
Below are other photographs I would like to share with the room pertaining to 3 mm and 2mm differences.
This is a block of 6 Washington 332's that are also 3mms as well. I always look at the perforations carefully between stamps with the Scott's 332's. If you line them up on a 2mm, they are not the same width size. The perforations are not directly in the middle between stamps. In the block of 6, in the top margin is also have the pin holes.
The Benjamin Franklin block of 4 also came along with the collection of unused stamps.



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
517 Posts
Posted 04/21/2017   12:00 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Rhett to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Those are not sheet stamps, they are booklet stamps. Therefore they are not blocks of 331 and 332 but booklet panes or portions thereof.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
181 Posts
Posted 04/21/2017   12:02 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Lioness2 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you Rhett for the clarification
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
181 Posts
Posted 04/21/2017   12:15 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Lioness2 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The perforations start from top of margin down. Stamps from booklets show this. I just thought I would share some examples of perforation differences.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 25 / Views: 3,205Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2023 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2023 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.6 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05