There is something that has been disturbing me for some time about what appears to be so called matching parallelism between the perforation holes found on the opposite rows of vertical perforations and on the opposite rows of horizontal perforations. This is to be expected from stamps that have been perforated by rotating bars mostly and sometimes but rarely and coincidentally on stamps perforated by rotating wheels.
- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
perforation hole matching parallelism (perforating bars)
-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
perforation hole non-matching parallelism (perforating wheels)
Flat plate perforation 11 (Kiusalas 72 = 10.94) should tend to show non-matching parallelism because it was made by rotary perforating wheels. However, unless I am mistaken in most of my observations of U.S. Scott # 596 and # 613, they tend to show matching parallelism on their perforations which is not to be expected for such perforations made from perforating wheels. See
https://siegelauctions.com/display_...hp?catno=596https://siegelauctions.com/display_...hp?catno=613