Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Difference between "Intaglio" & "Photogravure" Printings  
 

Previous Page | Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 6
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
640 Posts
Posted 02/20/2014   07:04 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Galeoptix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Back to Mexico circa 1917:

recess:





screenless photogravure:



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
640 Posts
Posted 02/20/2014   07:07 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Galeoptix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
recess:




screenless photogravure:




Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
640 Posts
Posted 02/20/2014   07:09 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Galeoptix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The very first Mexican stamps printed on the Goebel photogravure reel-fed rotary press:








Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
640 Posts
Posted 02/20/2014   07:12 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Galeoptix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The 1936 Goebel reel-fed photogravure press introduced for the 1936 Motorway commemoratives was also introducing new standard sizes!

The smaller size now 20.1x24.1mm and the larger size - exactly twice as large - 40.2x241.mm. Each stamp had 14 [or 28 teeth horizontally and 17 vertically. Perforation gauge: 13.93:14.11 i.e if we believe Celis Cano as to the measured sizes! Starting from 40x24mm the gauge will be 14.00:14.17

Sheets of 5x10 [larger size] and 10x10 [smaller size].






Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
640 Posts
Posted 02/20/2014   07:14 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Galeoptix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The 1934 defnitives introduced in standard sizes by the Oficina Impresora de Hacienda were to be adapted for the new Goebel press!

It is not clear whether the T.I.E.V. were just the new name for the Government Printers and/or had to do with new premises for the Printing Works? Philatelists usually do not pay that much attention to such details and I can not find any in G. Celis Cano.

On 01.04.1937 a few values of the 1934 definitives were issued in reduced sizes and printed on the new GOEBEL!

Although the German Michel did refer to recess for the 1936 Motorway series, for the 1937 definitives Michel uses the term Rastertiefdruck or photogravure. Michel also mentioned: "Hergestellt mit den neuen deutschen Tiefdruckmaschinen" or manufactured by the new German photogravure/recess press. The German word Tiefdruck refers to both akin processes!

Neither Michel nor Celis Cano do tell us what to expect of the 01.04.1937 definitives! Are they screenless? Are they screened
like the tradtional photogravure? Or can we find both types of printing methods????
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
640 Posts
Posted 02/20/2014   07:15 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Galeoptix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The 1c in screenless photogravure:





The 1c in screened photogravure:



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
640 Posts
Posted 02/20/2014   07:16 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Galeoptix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The 2c in screenless photogravure:





The 2c in screened photogravure:



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
640 Posts
Posted 02/20/2014   07:16 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Galeoptix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The 4c in screenless photogravure:





The 4c in screened photogravure?

I have NOT found this version yet! But it is likely to exist!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
640 Posts
Posted 02/20/2014   07:17 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Galeoptix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The 5c in screenless photogravure:





The 5c in screened photogravure:









the 5c has quite some shades!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
640 Posts
Posted 02/20/2014   07:18 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Galeoptix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The 10c in screenless photogravure I have NOT found yet!

The 10c in screened photogravure:







Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
640 Posts
Posted 02/20/2014   07:18 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Galeoptix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The 20c Airmail in screenless photogravure





The 20c Airmail in screened photogravure:





Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
640 Posts
Posted 02/20/2014   08:47 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Galeoptix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
How to tell the difference between recess and photogravure?

The most common answer to that question is that recess has been engraved and photogravure has been photomechanically reproduced, the plates or cylinders etched and the design screened!

In fact neither the reproduction technique nor the screening has anything to do with it!

It is a traditional difference in which for recess the ink was viscose and had to be pressed out of the recesses [deepened areas] and for photogravure the ink was superfluent and the ink nearly jumped out of the recesses!

The printing machines were constructed to apply to these differences and the plates or cylinders for recess were extremely heavy and big. The photogravure cylinders, however, were lighter and smaller.

Both printing methods have undergone so many changes and improvements that you can hardly tell the difference but for the fact that the printing machines are constructed still differently and the inks are different as well as to their viscosity...

So now we have recess from screened and etched cylinders and photogravure without screens or electro-mechanically engraved...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
640 Posts
Posted 02/20/2014   08:50 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Galeoptix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Screened recess was used quite frequently by the Joh. Enschedé Security Printing Works in Haarlem during the 1950-ies uptil the 1970-ies!

The Netherlands Stamp Exhibition Amphilex 1967:





Luxemburg Roman Art in 1973:

The Luxemburg stamp even had the Giori-process!








Note the blue spots in the letters "U", "X", etc. :)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
640 Posts
Posted 02/20/2014   08:56 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Galeoptix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
How bad a nicely engraved design can be damaged!



At the left the stamp engraved by René Cottet, at the right its modification:






The screen points still had been nicely "engraved" - or rather etched photomechanically :D :mad:
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
640 Posts
Posted 02/20/2014   08:58 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Galeoptix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The Austrian airmail stamps issued in 1935 - August 16th - are mentioned in the Austrian Netto Katalog [ANK] as being printed in recess. They make however an impression of being printed in photogravure???






Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 6 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Promoting the integrity of internet philatelic dealers. Please join us so buyers can buy with confidence.United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum TopicsRecently Active Forum Topics
  Stamp Identification Wanted
  U.S. ~1870 3c Washington (No grill) Perf 12 - Identification please
  U.S. S.C. #599a Perf 10 - Please verify identification
  Grandmother's stamp accumulation
  Nice uncut example of R189 with interesting handstamp cancel
  Separating sheets of stamps
  Could someone please tell me the difference between these stamps?
  counting peaks and valleys of die cut stamps (example flag over porch)
  U.S. 1920s 2c Washington Perf 11 - 19 x 21.9 mm - What is Scott Number please
  U.S. 1893 10c S.C. #237 - Double Transfer C.V. $13.50?
  U.S. 1861 1c S.C. #63 - What is this cancel?
  Using Descriptive Titles to Help the Reader, and Search Engines
  "Funny they do this" .......... "my 2018 version"
  Never found ths before..Scott 275
  Franklin 1c stamp and washington 7c stamp
  U.S. 3c. Washington - S.C. #10 or #11?
  U.S. 1847 Benjamin Franklin 5c S.C. #1 - Color?
  Australian Coil Stamps
  UK variety missing 5d
  Mis-Identified ebay listings
  Scott 539 on eBay - weird bidding
  Recent Revenue Acquisitions
  Western Union Telegraph stamp
  Is it just me, or are 3 out of these 4 reperfed?
  Tahiti postage stamp & the 1882 25c Overprint

  UK variety missing 5d
  U.S. ~1870 3c Washington (No grill) Perf 12 - Identification please
  U.S. 1893 10c S.C. #237 - Double Transfer C.V. $13.50?
  U.S. S.C. #599a Perf 10 - Please verify identification
  Grandmother's stamp accumulation
  Separating sheets of stamps
  Reptiles on stamps?
  Stamp Identification Wanted
  UK old stamps, cannot determine catalog number
  Poets' Corner
  Great Britain : On Steiner pages.
  New South Wales Perfin OS-NSW
  New, Free, US Stamp Album Pages
  Nice uncut example of R189 with interesting handstamp cancel
  Barcelona & Catalonia Cinderellas
  counting peaks and valleys of die cut stamps (example flag over porch)
  Quiz for cover collectors.
  My new favourite cover! Sc # 20 I think
  U.S. 1920s 2c Washington Perf 11 - 19 x 21.9 mm - What is Scott Number please
  Printing error on QEII coronation stamp
  Mailman - Mailmen
  Could someone please tell me the difference between these stamps?
  POWERED Ships, Boats, Liners, Tugs, etc... NON-SAIL
  Using Descriptive Titles to Help the Reader, and Search Engines
  Never found ths before..Scott 275

Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2018 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2005 - 2018 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.8 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05