Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Se-Tenant and Catalog Value  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1128 Posts
Posted 07/23/2011   10:39 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add ncbuckeye to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
In a discussion with a local youth who collects stamps, he posed this question. Hw was looking at the 2009 edition of the U.S. Postal Service Guide to Stamps which uses Scott numbers and values. Some of the early se-tenant issues (examples are 1972 1456-1459 and 1973 1480-1483) have the uncancelled joined block of 4 with a lower value than each of the 4 stamps separated. He asked if he should separate his block of 4 so that the stamps would be worth more! I understand that Scott's places a 20 cent minimum on a single issue, but it would seem logical to me that for a se-tenant issue, the whole should always be equal to at least the sum of the parts! Oh, yes, I convinced him to keep as a block of 4.
Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 07/23/2011   12:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The Postal Service Guide to US Stamps is based on the Scott Catalog, and the Scott Catalog does indeed show lower values for many blocks and/or se-tenant set of stamps than they do for each stamp separated individually. In fact, there are even situations where some of these modern blocks of stamps are worth more used than mint! Not that the stamps are particularly valuable, but many multiples were saved by collectors in mint form and few saw postal use. However, if you tried to use those stamps today, they would probably be worth less as the term "used" typically applies to contemporaneous cancellations and not cancels that were applied 10, 20 or 30 years later.

The stamps you recite are from the early 1970's and to take the issue to the extreme, look at the 2-cent National Parks Centennial stamps (Scott 1448-51). As each separated stamp is given a minimum catalog value of 20 cents, you would think a block of four would be worth 80 cents, but in fact it's assigned catalog number 1451a and only worth a mere 25 cents!

The reality is that catalog values aren't meant to give a true value to a common stamp. The minimum catalog value takes into account a dealer's cost to maintain his store, and his overhead, and his cost to keep on-hand the inventory of stamps a collector may want. In most cases stamps sell for much less. It's all supply and demand. If a collector needs one or two stamps to fill spaces in his album, no matter how common, he may be willing to buy it above catalog value simply to accomplish his goal while others may wait until the stamp is found at a deep discount.

The other issue to consider is that in dealing with a used stamp that may have a catalog minimum of 20 cents, most will know that the re-sale will probably be a couple of cents (if that); just because someone may have accumulated 10,000 copies of that same used stamp, doesn't mean that you can apply a $2000 value to it; as they will still only sell for pennies.

That's why catalogs are often referred to as a "Guide" Just because an item may be listed as being worth a set amount doesn't mean it's worth that on the resale market. The true value all comes down to what a buyer is willing to pay and what a seller is willing to accept to make the deal go through.

An analogy I use quite often is that you can go into a new car showroom and see the perfect car with a $30,000 sticker price but few would expect to pay that, as most would want a discount and a rebate and any other promotional incentive to get the car at far less than list (catalog) price may suggest. Same general principle holds true for stamps or coins or antiques or any other item of value.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts
Posted 07/23/2011   12:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add I_Love_Stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Very well put wt1. That cleared up some questions I have had about this topic. So, thanx.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum TopicsRecently Active Forum Topics
  Program or software for cancels
  When a typographical error doesn't really make any difference.
  Security Bank Note Co. Proof, can someone give me insight to this piece?
  Australian Historic Homesteads - Prepaid Envelopes 1988
  A new test stamp variety?
  Ebay Lot So Bad I Am Speechless
  50 years of jet travel
  What countries does Scott 2016 san-z cover?
  program to identify precancels
  US precancels with full state names
  Canadian Revenues Valuations
  Turkey in Asia Overprints
  'ungummed' 'unused' full sheet of 1990 stamps: why?
  Damaged Stamp Grading
  Canal Zone J27 plate block with full offset of plate number 123718 on reverse
  Help With 1895 Korea 6a Stamp
  Avatar request
  MPO 603 - Debert Camp Censor handstamp
  Need Binder for Davo Pages
  Canada Post Distribution Problem????
  Czechoslovakia Scott 45a, Minkus 52, SG 27, Imperforate 1919-1920 Hradcany Prague
  Canal Zone 18b vs. 20
  Home Made Album Page Prototype - Thoughts / Suggestions?
  Rocky Mountain Stamp Show 2018
  Is this unusual ... ...?

  Collecting by Engraver
  Paying 70% of Scott - ripped off?
  Program or software for cancels
  Quick question for Steiner Page Binders
  Japanese Translation Please.
  A new test stamp variety?
  New, free online The Foreign Mail Cancellations Handbook
  Need Binder for Davo Pages
  Bare Feet on Stamps ' , ' , ' , '
  The Stamps of Australia : On Steiner Pages.
  Turkey in Asia Overprints
  Your self designed album pages
  What Did You Do Philatelically: Today or Recently?
  Ebay Lot So Bad I Am Speechless
  Perhaps the most absurd eBay lot of all time
  Formosa (?) Help Please
  US precancels with full state names
  Oldest American-published stamp album?
  How would I start / continue to identify this 10 cent Jefferson?
  Damaged Stamp Grading
  Stamps from China and possibly Japan.
  Home Made Album Page Prototype - Thoughts / Suggestions?
  When a typographical error doesn't really make any difference.
  Security Bank Note Co. Proof, can someone give me insight to this piece?
  Anthony's LLC Disminal PF Report Card = Follow Up to 10/23/17 Discussion

Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2018 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2005 - 2018 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.32 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05