Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Southington, CT Precancel Question  
 

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 03/01/2013   09:43 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
I happened to come across this document when web surfing the internet recently. Can anyone tell me if this means that such postmarks from Southington, CT are really precancels or is it one of those areas where there is really "no way to tell" since the same markings would likely have been used on other pieces of mail?

Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
2733 Posts
Posted 03/01/2013   11:03 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add warrehouse to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Fun & Interesting, The Postmaster seemed pretty reserved with Mr Ball!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
87 Posts
Posted 03/01/2013   1:06 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Oregonian to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I believe these are the electro-plate the postmaster was speaking of, so his "allowance" was granted at some point these are one the Perf 12 1922 series, so one has to ask where was the device in 1935?

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 03/01/2013   2:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
If I read the Postmaster's letter correctly, he indicated that he had the device in 1935, but Washington would not give him the required allowance needed to have the precancel professionally printed, so the alternative was to use the handstamps shown.

As I suggested earlier, it seems to me that the use of those "handstamps" may have effectively created a precancel that served the purposes needed for that year, but for precancel collectors there would be no way to identify if those "handstamps" were legitimately used as a precancel unless the example were collected on cover. In other words, an example of a stamp soaked off paper with the above postmarks would be impossible to identify as a legitimate precancel. Probably the very reason why the PSS catalogs do not recognize it as a listed variety (or varieties).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
87 Posts
Posted 03/01/2013   2:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Oregonian to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Shame on me, I did read that the wrong way. Now I wonder why the PO lost it's "allowance" and resorted to a handstamp provincial, and I wonder if the precancels catalog Gods would use this letter to justify listing it as a legit precancel and not a provincial?
Mike
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2000 Posts
Posted 03/01/2013   3:54 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add chasa to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The Gods [aka the gatekeepers] will not allow it in the PSS T&T catalog [aka the BIBLE].
One problem with it is that they were not used exclusively for precancelling - and that is usually the rationale for excluding these locally improvised cancellers. The fact that it EVER was used in a precancelling context is not sufficient.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum Topics Recently Active Forum Topics
  Now this is one seriously red stamp
  I wonder if this item is never hinged?
  Things you Probably Won't Find at Dealer Tables
  Very rare set of the 1949-50 Coat of Arms
  What is normal practice for reopening lots in a live auction?
  Precancel prices vs. Scott
  Is this considered offset on back of this stamp..?
  Scott 498 - different colours..??
  Minnesota Stamp Expo
  Advertising Pages from 1907 Scott
  Morocco Page not Usually seen in Big Blue
  Christmas Stamps of 1970 - Kiss Print or Double Print
  More cluelessness, as if no one was convinced yet
  Alaska Mass Flight Mail - 1934
  Guide lines and joint lines for coil pairs
  help me plate this scott 21 type III
  Complete set of Australian Framas
  Total eclipse scott number
  Early Ceylon with "CAVE" overprint
  Over & underinked embossed covers and 1 cut square
  Question Regarding Color of GB Scott 98
  Scott 1700a or 1700e
  Do you recognize this cancellation?
  Ebay netflix tax now impossed on all Australian ebay sellers
  Old Stamp Collection Book

  Mounting Stamps
  Is this considered offset on back of this stamp..?
  Which stamp do you wish having that you don't have?
  What is normal practice for reopening lots in a live auction?
  Things you Probably Won't Find at Dealer Tables
  Christmas Stamps of 1970 - Kiss Print or Double Print
  Now this is one seriously red stamp
  Stamp Pricing Books and Websites
  Automatic Supplements
  I wonder if this item is never hinged?
  New to Plate Block Collecting
  Very rare set of the 1949-50 Coat of Arms
  italy stamp imperf 1862-63 is this type I or type II,please help me identify?
  Advertising Pages from 1907 Scott
  Unitrade Canada 2017 Current Catalogue Status
  Minnesota Stamp Expo
  Guide lines and joint lines for coil pairs
  Marker Monkey's Friend, the Stamp Butcher
  My Australian Collection 1850 - 1965
  Classifying Official/Penalty Envelopes
  Famous Architects
  Alaska Mass Flight Mail - 1934
  Something strange on the back of this pair of revenue stamps
  Best catalog to purchase
  Morocco Page not Usually seen in Big Blue

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2017 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2014 Stamp Community Forums Go To Top Of Page
It took 0.45 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05