Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Colorado Questions - What Are These?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,775Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
484 Posts
Posted 02/27/2015   1:56 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add JanS to your friends list Get a Link to this Message


The first one (Crook) is an 841 with a font variation (larger C than normal). There are some notations in the TnT catalog, but they don't exactly match my stamp, so I am not sure what type of 841 this is.

841 (O/C, 3) = the "3" refers to the footnote about the font variation, so that is ok. But the O/C means that one of the O's of Crook should be directly above the C of CO (Colorado). But clearly on this stamp, the state is further left than that, leaving CO centered under the first O of Crook.

841 (O/CO, 9, COOK) = the 9 refers to the misspelling COOK, which only happens in certain parts of the device, and obviously not on my stamp, so that is not an issue here. But O/CO means that the CO should be under an O, which is what I have on this stamp.

So which is this -- the first type of 841 because of the font or the second type because of the position of O/CO?

Did maybe the larger C just push the whole word further to the right, changing the positioning of CO?

THE next one for Dove Creek is unlisted - fake, post-cancel?

THE last two are likewise unlisted for Gilman. Also fakes/etc.?

Thanks.


Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
2500 Posts
Posted 02/27/2015   2:35 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add chasa to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Crook: this is the 841(3) type. Excellent examples of the differences and WHY are shown on the PSS archive (members only). The other's - they might look like precancels but they are not - oddly enough because they were not used as precancels. With non-government styles - this alone is sufficient to keep them from being listed in the PSS Town and Type catalog.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
990 Posts
Posted 02/27/2015   4:36 pm  Show Profile Check orstampman's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add orstampman to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
So are these other cancels "post-cancels", authentic cancels, for parcels or other postal use?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2500 Posts
Posted 02/27/2015   6:12 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add chasa to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
yes, apparently used in the post office
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
12128 Posts
Posted 02/27/2015   9:29 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wt1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Although this has nothing to do with the precancels, it's fascinating to learn that Crook, Colorado had a 2010 population of only 110, yet still has an operating post office!



On the other hand, Gilman, Colorado had been a company mining town since 1886 but has been a ghost town since 1986, strictly off-limits because of contamination of air and water and is/was an EPA Superfund Site.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
484 Posts
Posted 03/01/2015   12:53 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add JanS to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
You always find such neat information, wt1.

But it frustrates me that the town I formerly lived in (pop. over 50,000) couldn't have a USPS office, not even a counter in a grocery store, yet somehow ones like this stay open.

I was in the backwoods of NM a few months ago and came across a town with 3 USPS offices to serve a population of under 6,000.

I'm a totally supporter of the USPS, but stupidity like that makes me mad.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 1,775Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2023 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2023 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.08 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05