Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

topical collecting and printing processes  
 

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
22 Posts
Posted 10/27/2016   8:05 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add angreeley to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I apologize if I'm repeating a previous thread topic here, but I'm curious to know how everything thinks various stamp printing processes rank in quality. I know many of you here are particularly fond of engraved stamps, as am I, and I'd love to have your thoughts on stamps printed by photogravure and other processes. Are there certain types of printed stamps, for those of you topical collectors, that you avoid collecting for reasons of detail or quality?
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
652 Posts
Posted 10/28/2016   04:28 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Galeoptix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I love photogravure in all it variations.. Recess is over-appreciated. The time of an engraver working months to prepare a stamp are long gone bye. France and Austria use computer-steered "engraving" of every sliiy design ...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
271 Posts
Posted 10/31/2016   04:02 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add 65170 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Angreeley: Every printing process has its fan and detractor. How do you measure quality; much is subjective. Engraved stamps come top of my list (no surprise there), for the skills employed at all stages of production (yes, even when computer engraved) and are second to none.

The design should always be applicable to the process used and many designers, especially from the "computer age", do not seem to appreciate this! Some gravure stamps, for example, should never have used that process, as the design does not take advantage of the tonal qualities of gravure. Similarly, some engraved stamps printed by intaglio offer nothing by using that process (as Rein states) and could have been done by solely using offset, which would be much cheaper and have no loss in visual quality or impact. Some administrations use offset instead of using intaglio to the total detriment of the finished stamp, which often appear flat and lifeless.

Each process has specific attributes and I have made an attempt at describing some of these below.

Intaglio: A high security process (hence its continued use on banknotes). Difficult and expensive to replicate by forgers. Great for all line work, portraits and vignettes. Very tactile with its raised surface. Works especially well when printed in just one colour, or at most two (a personal view!).

Letterpress: Currently undergoing a resurgence, but not on stamps. Older letterpress stamps could invariably be best identified from the reverse side because the design often felt raised to the touch due to the use of the metal plates and heavy pressure used. These days, plastic plates are used and tend not to leave the raised reverse. Modern "Letterpress" stamps tend to actually be by flexography and are indistinguishable from offset to the eye.

Gravure: Especially good when designs utilise tonal ranges (i.e. gradations of colour). Best suited for long print runs (some printers say 10 million plus stamps), so do not expect a tiny island that posts very little mail to print by gravure, unless they have a huge print budget!

Offset: Best suited for small to medium sized print runs. The widespread use of offset saw multi-coloured stamps rapidly take-over from one or two coloured stamps. This is the most readily accessible form of commercial printing available today, with comparatively low set-up costs and suitability for runs up to around ten million stamps. Today, around nine out of ten stamps that are produced worldwide use offset. (Source of usage statistic: The UPU, Switzerland.)

Silk screen: Great for where heavy ink weights are required, e.g. the latex 'scratch-off' areas on some stamps, or large areas of solid ink colour, such as a mono-coloured background. Not good for, say, 'fine line' text.

Digital: Currently best suited for small print runs (but slowly increasing in volume as new machines develop). Every stamp on an entire print run could theoretically be different (i.e. unique). Easier to forge, as many of us own some of the production equipment in our homes, such as colour laser printers. There are not enough digital stamps "out there" yet for forgery to have taken hold, but I suggest that it will become a problem over time.

As for thematic (topical) collectors, I used to collect based purely on design and the ability of that stamp to advance the story that I was attempting to tell. I cannot imagine that any other thematic collector would buy a stamp unless it advanced their story, which implies that the stamp had the "detail and quality" that he sought. The process used would not enter into my buying decision, nor would poor quality printing if the stamp depicted the only known example of an 1852 letter box from a particular country on a stamp!

I hope this may help. GLENN
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
22 Posts
Posted 11/05/2016   12:43 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add angreeley to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Glenn, thank you so much for your response. Your descriptions of the printing processes are very helpful. I see now why some photogravure stamps I quite like, and why others look terrible to me. Excellent info!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Promoting the integrity of internet philatelic dealers. Please join us so buyers can buy with confidence.United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!Genuine H.E. Harris products and quality postage stamps at www.whitman.com. POSTAGE STAMPS, STAMP ALBUMS & ANNUAL SUPPLEMENTS!What's on your wall? Check out our handmade, screen printed stamp art. Perfect for your collector room, office and more. Buy online today!
New Forum TopicsRecently Active Forum Topics
  Scott 30b - Possible "Balloon Flaw"..?
  Dealing with eBay Changes: Specifically Ended Items
  Is this considered a cut cancel?
  Mt Fuji substation & postmark
  Looking for sources of info to help id all Great American types/varieties
  Looking for Precancel Bureau Mail Early Blks with Bar&City
  US #518b 1917 Franklin 1 dollar
  NOVAPEX 2018 - Dartmouth Nova Scotia , Canada -September 14 -16
  Why I Hate Selling Books on Ebay
  The elusive "propriwtary" revenue stamp variety
  Old checks with stamps
  The most misleading auction lot description of all time? (Narcotic stamps)
  Does anyone know what Scott# this is
  Scott 25ii - This could be "Bothwell paper"
  Frank Geiger - still in Business?
  Another great offering for everyone's funny bone!
  AIRPEX 2018 August 24 and 25 FRI. Noon-6, SAT. 10-4
  Use of c or Abbreviation for Classic Stamp Descriptions
  The importance of understanding a catalog listing
  Are these USA precanceled stamps?
  Catalogue listings not showing values.
  Indo China overprinted with Viet Nam - Dan Chu Cong HOA - North Vietnam?
  WW2 covers censored in Canada AND USA ?
  Help needed in identifying stamp on Malta 1988 money order
  Getting back into the hobby

  Canada new $4 definitive press sheet
  The future of stamp selling on eBay
  Scott 30b - Possible "Balloon Flaw"..?
  My first APS stampshow
  Dealing with eBay Changes: Specifically Ended Items
  What am I missing about this Scott 35? Why $200+?
  Is this considered a cut cancel?
  Need help to identify a Japanese stamp
  Tanks on Stamps
  Scott 25ii - This could be "Bothwell paper"
  Famous Architects
  Another great offering for everyone's funny bone!
  Looking for sources of info to help id all Great American types/varieties
  Let's see your most recently purchased stamps
  (EFO) Errors Freaks and Oddities
  SHOW ME your sports stamps!
  Any interest in world Postal Stationery?
  Latin Species Names For Plants & Animals
  The elusive "propriwtary" revenue stamp variety
  The Art of Magic Lenticular Printing
  Glazed paper vs unglazed
  What FISH stamps do you have???
  Stamps with no country
  BAAAA! BAAAA!
  1c 1851 Plate 12 Stamps

Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2018 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2005 - 2018 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.3 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05