Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Book wine stamp perf 12 Vs 12.5  
 

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
50 Posts
Posted 01/06/2017   5:32 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add therevenueman to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
Hello SCF, the 2017 Scott specialized catalogue added two wine stamp perf verities this year RE107E and RE107F the perf 12-1/2 of RE107C and RE107D. My question is there any way to tell the difference between the two based on serial numbers or other information as I have a hard time seeing half of a perf per 20mm.
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
4280 Posts
Posted 01/06/2017   7:18 pm  Show Profile Check Petert4522's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi revenueman. I do not quite understand the question. The difference between 12 and 12.5 should be easily detectable with a perforation gauge?

Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
302 Posts
Posted 01/06/2017   7:19 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revenuermd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The perf 12 was the work of the Rosback perforator that produced the well known Scott 536, the one cent offset postage stamp. One way of identifying the perf 12 varieties of the $50 and $100 book wine stamps would be to compare the perforations to an example of 536. Only the $50 and $100 stamps were produced after 1938 and that is when the Roebuck perforator was used. So these are the higher serial numbers. My best guess is that serial numbers higher than 18000 on the $50 denomination were all perf 12 . Similarly serial numbers over 40001 for the $100 were all perf 12 .

The perf 12 stamps are much more common than the Kiusalas perf 12-67 (actually closer to perf 11 ). I estimated that only 5000 of the $50 were produced perf 12-67 and during the period when I was actively exhibiting the wine stamps I recorded only 8 in collections (I recorded 21 of the perf 12 in collections).

Similarly I estimated that only 27,000 of the $100 were produced and at the time I recorded only 9 in collections (I recorded 78 of the perf 12 in collections).

I would guess that an updated census on the perf 12-67 stamps would not differ markedly from my figures. However, I would guess that the $100 perf 12 census today is significantly higher.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page


Ron Lesher
Valued Member
United States
302 Posts
Posted 01/06/2017   7:22 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revenuermd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
As you may guess from my previous post I was one of the people who urged the listing of the two perforation varieties. I first wrote about these perforation varieties in The American Philatelist in 1983!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page


Ron Lesher
Pillar Of The Community
2162 Posts
Posted 01/07/2017   07:44 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jogil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
There were two different Rosback perforators involved:

Stroke perforator for Kiusalas 12-67=11.75
http://www.rosbackcompany.com/images/Foot_Perf.jpg
https://www.google.ca/patents/US387543

Rotary perforator for Kiusalas 12.5-63=12.50
http://www.rosbackcompany.com/images/pony_perf.jpg
https://www.google.ca/patents/US1127092
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by jogil - 01/07/2017 2:00 pm
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum Topics Recently Active Forum Topics
  Precancel prices vs. Scott
  Is this considered offset on back of this stamp..?
  Scott 498 - different colours..??
  Minnesota Stamp Expo
  Advertising Pages from 1907 Scott
  Morocco Page not Usually seen in Big Blue
  Christmas Stamps of 1970 - Kiss Print or Double Print
  More cluelessness, as if no one was convinced yet
  Alaska Mass Flight Mail - 1934
  Guide lines and joint lines for coil pairs
  help me plate this scott 21 type III
  Complete set of Australian Framas
  Total eclipse scott number
  Early Ceylon with "CAVE" overprint
  Over & underinked embossed covers and 1 cut square
  Question Regarding Color of GB Scott 98
  Scott 1700a or 1700e
  Do you recognize this cancellation?
  Ebay netflix tax now impossed on all Australian ebay sellers
  Old Stamp Collection Book
  Has anyone seen this R155 overprint inking anomaly before?
  RB15c with bogus rouletting?
  National Surety and us senate air mail
  $2 Columbian MNH Full Pane of 100 - Auction Watch
  Double print or over inked or printed on the gummed side ?

  Precancel prices vs. Scott
  Is this considered offset on back of this stamp..?
  Scott 498 - different colours..??
  Alaska Mass Flight Mail - 1934
  Morocco Page not Usually seen in Big Blue
  italy stamp imperf 1862-63 is this type I or type II,please help me identify?
  Scott 1700a or 1700e
  Automatic Supplements
  Minnesota Stamp Expo
  Regency Stamps is just the latest in a long line of philatelic carpetbaggers and scalawags ...
  Advertising Pages from 1907 Scott
  Christmas Stamps of 1970 - Kiss Print or Double Print
  Total eclipse scott number
  More cluelessness, as if no one was convinced yet
  New to Plate Block Collecting
  2017 USPS Issues... News? Thoughts? Opinions?
  Need help! Have big collection of early stamps
  Science-Fiction/Fantasy Stamps
  One of these eBay sellers is a bit clueless
  help me plate this scott 21 type III
  Guide lines and joint lines for coil pairs
  Reorganizing Scott International
  Globes
  Classifying Official/Penalty Envelopes
  Cogwheels

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2017 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2014 Stamp Community Forums Go To Top Of Page
It took 0.47 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05