Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

USPS 2016 Postal Service Guide to U.S. Stamps, 43rd Edition  
 

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
31 Posts
Posted 01/09/2017   1:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add BwanaBob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
I just ordered this edition since I hadn't bought one in about 5 years. I am sorely disappointed. Here are my complaints:

1) Horrible images. They claim they were all recently digitally scanned. The resolution is much worse than the previous volumes where the colors were rich and the sizes of the images were larger.

1a) Terribly inconsistent image coloring. On pages where say multiple carmine colored stamps are printed, many of them are totally different colors. I can't blame the printers since some of the stamps on the same page are correct. My suspicion is the producers of this book farmed out image scanning to several interns who all did things differently. There's no way any copy editor who reviewed these
images was a stamp collector. No way. There are some stamps I didn't even recognize because the colors were so off.

2) Incomplete images. All Federal Duck images should have been included. In older editions this was so. Lazy.

3) They persist in their habit of sticking the latest years issues up front as if they are somehow special compared to the rest of the stamps. Why? Also, since they have some deal with Amos Publishing, and have access to Scott numbering there is no excuse for not having those numbers for the 2016 issues. If it's a lead time issue, then delay releasing the book for a month.

4) Needless fluff sections on philately basics. Leave that stuff on the website. Each page wasted there could have been used for more detailed listings and images of Duck stamps, postal stationary releases, etc.

I will be slow to replace this book in the coming years unless I hear of some of these issues being addressed.
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
4282 Posts
Posted 01/09/2017   1:46 pm  Show Profile Check Petert4522's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
BwanaBob, you really should address this to the US Postal Service!

Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1817 Posts
Posted 01/09/2017   7:54 pm  Show Profile Check TheArtfulHinger's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add TheArtfulHinger to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Needless fluff sections on philately basics. Leave that stuff on the website.

I don't have a copy of the book to see how much space they devote to such "fluff", but keep in mind what is fluff to you might be new and interesting information to someone else. There are undoubtedly many beginners or casual collectors who buy that book, and for some of them it might be their introduction to collecting. Keep in mind the USPS is writing it for the "intelligent but uninformed reader", so to speak, and not for advanced collectors. Even Scott devotes a fair amount of pages to what could be considered "basics" in the into to their catalogues.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by TheArtfulHinger - 01/09/2017 7:56 pm
Valued Member
110 Posts
Posted 01/10/2017   10:04 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add soccerfan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I've seen their books at hobby shops and the library. I suspect that USPS has new employees designing their guides. The images and resolutions are probably a cheaper way for them to update and design the book. Beckett creates magazines and books for sports cards; the magazines are image free of cards due to spacing issues. The company always lists their cards from oldest to newest. More companies are switching their resources from printed material to online viewing. Keep in mind that printed materials are only guides for a certain period in time (like a balance sheet). I use annual Scott books for checklists. If I need to distinguish images (size, color, etc.) I visit a source (Amos, eBay) online.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
87 Posts
Posted 01/10/2017   11:03 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add svensson to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
They are entertaining beginner guides that I have had no qualms about in the past, going back to USPS's "Stamps and Stories" in the 1970s. Sorry to hear that quality seems to be deteriorating...as you say, the advertising jazz implies that the image quality was improved in this edition! They are really not designed for someone looking to keep up on day by day price fluctuations (Becketts analogy...), they have been a quality product. imho
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
31 Posts
Posted 01/10/2017   4:50 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add BwanaBob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
svensson - Yes, their advertising hype implied much better imagery. I have many of the older volumes that were beautiful consistent and also glossy. Now the new book is not glossy but that's not why many of the images are terrible. They could not have been consistently sourced. I'm steamed that this book was not first given to someone who was a collector for vetting. I also forgot to mention that in their zeal to protect revenue, they put slashes through every value on every image - including the word forever.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
31 Posts
Posted 01/10/2017   5:05 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add BwanaBob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Oh, and I vented to the USPS in an email. Curious to hear their response. I will share it if it has any merit.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
31 Posts
Posted 03/21/2017   2:59 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add BwanaBob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
They never responded other than "we received your comments". Typical.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum Topics Recently Active Forum Topics
  Things you Probably Won't Find at Dealer Tables
  Very rare set of the 1949-50 Coat of Arms
  What is normal practice for reopening lots in a live auction?
  Precancel prices vs. Scott
  Is this considered offset on back of this stamp..?
  Scott 498 - different colours..??
  Minnesota Stamp Expo
  Advertising Pages from 1907 Scott
  Morocco Page not Usually seen in Big Blue
  Christmas Stamps of 1970 - Kiss Print or Double Print
  More cluelessness, as if no one was convinced yet
  Alaska Mass Flight Mail - 1934
  Guide lines and joint lines for coil pairs
  help me plate this scott 21 type III
  Complete set of Australian Framas
  Total eclipse scott number
  Early Ceylon with "CAVE" overprint
  Over & underinked embossed covers and 1 cut square
  Question Regarding Color of GB Scott 98
  Scott 1700a or 1700e
  Do you recognize this cancellation?
  Ebay netflix tax now impossed on all Australian ebay sellers
  Old Stamp Collection Book
  Has anyone seen this R155 overprint inking anomaly before?
  RB15c with bogus rouletting?

  My Australian Collection 1850 - 1965
  What is normal practice for reopening lots in a live auction?
  Classifying Official/Penalty Envelopes
  italy stamp imperf 1862-63 is this type I or type II,please help me identify?
  Things you Probably Won't Find at Dealer Tables
  Very rare set of the 1949-50 Coat of Arms
  Famous Architects
  Alaska Mass Flight Mail - 1934
  New to Plate Block Collecting
  Which stamp do you wish having that you don't have?
  Something strange on the back of this pair of revenue stamps
  Best catalog to purchase
  Morocco Page not Usually seen in Big Blue
  Need help! Have big collection of early stamps
  Reorganizing Scott International
  Precancel prices vs. Scott
  $2 Columbian MNH Full Pane of 100 - Auction Watch
  Is this considered offset on back of this stamp..?
  Advertising Pages from 1907 Scott
  help me plate this scott 21 type III
  Minnesota Stamp Expo
  One of these eBay sellers is a bit clueless
  Guide lines and joint lines for coil pairs
  Scott 498 - different colours..??
  Scott 1700a or 1700e

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2017 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2014 Stamp Community Forums Go To Top Of Page
It took 0.58 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05