Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

"Near very fine" wording?  
 

Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar Of The Community
United States
899 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   1:28 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add James Drummond to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
H. R. Harmer (https://hrharmer.com/en/home#) has an upcoming auction #3013 with some interesting lot descriptions, at least in the revenue section.

This stamp is described as "near very fine."





Maybe it's just me, but it seems like saying a stamp is almost very well centered, when it fact it clearly isn't, is a weird way of describing something.

It's like saying something is almost new: it either is new, or it isn't.

Perhaps this goes with the "couple blunted perfs" comment, when clearly one fourth of all the perforations are "blunted." So, 25% is a "couple"?

Jim
Send note to Staff

Valued Member
United States
440 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   1:36 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jarnick to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
"near very fine" clearly means fine. Almost as bad as "would be very fine but for missing corner".
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1237 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   3:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add bookbndrbob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Not to mention a pretty sloppy reperforating job on the left side.

How about "nearly very fine, except for clipped right side, short perf on top, reperforated left side, and centering."
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
899 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   3:17 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add James Drummond to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
One last thing: the cancel is printed, not handstamped.

So... pretty much everything in the item description is incorrect.

Jim
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4386 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   5:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It's probably not reperforated, just some very dull pins. It's a well known printed cancel, but they are not particularly knowledgeable about revenues. The opening bid is probably too close to the retail value for it to get any bids.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4386 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   5:15 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Actually the next lot appears to be worse; I doubt that it is genuine. Nor is 1673 likely to be genuine. And I have my doubts about 1683.

https://stampauctionnetwork.com/ha/ha301334.cfm#97
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
899 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   5:29 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add James Drummond to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I think you meant lot 1684?

Almost a classic fake imperf.: three reasonable margins and then the fourth is no margin at all.

Jim


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4386 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   5:43 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The $1.60 would have to be looked at, but it actually has much to recommend itself. The impression and shade appear to be correct. And these values were printed quite close together, it would be very unusual to have both the top and bottom margins so wide on a perforated stamp. I am inclined to think it genuine, albeit a not very attractive example.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4386 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   5:46 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Some perforated pairs from the Curtis census. Notice how small the margins are.

http://www.thecurtiscollection.com/...stampType=66
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
313 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   6:50 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add 1typesetter to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
And no mention of the pinholes in Lot 1698.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4386 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   7:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Looks like staple holes and a small tear. Must be part of the premium.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
3331 Posts
Posted 05/18/2017   9:04 pm  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
The $1.60 would have to be looked at, but it actually has much to recommend itself. The impression and shade appear to be correct. And these values were printed quite close together, it would be very unusual to have both the top and bottom margins so wide on a perforated stamp. I am inclined to think it genuine, albeit a not very attractive example.


I agree with Bart. As much as one can tell from Interwebz pictures, if I had to bet on one side or the other, I would lean genuine.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
1151 Posts
Posted 08/16/2017   02:17 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stampmaster to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi all, I think I know what "Interwebz" means, but not totally for sure.

Would someone explain what the meaning is?

Stampmaster
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
389 Posts
Posted 08/16/2017   06:56 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dkabq8 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
interwebz = internet
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
560 Posts
Posted 08/16/2017   07:25 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Glenn Estus to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Why not just use the word "internet" rather than "interwebz" which hardly anyone know or needs to know. Is this an example of an "elite" speaking to the "masses"?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
899 Posts
Posted 08/16/2017   10:38 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add James Drummond to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Is this an example of an "elite" speaking to the "masses"?


I don't think so. It's just slang; a "different" way of saying something that is a twist in a way.

I would guess that the intent of using this particular word was to be humorous.

Jim
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum TopicsRecently Active Forum Topics
  Keep getting this error message when trying to post on SCF
  Last one. Is this a stamp or a cinderella?
  What kind of a stamp is this?
  I'm going to attempt to post some pictures for help with value
  Official Seal Intact on Cover
  Can you help me identify where this stamp is from?
  Ecuador to NYC Air Mail Cover - Circa 1939 - For Those Who Like ENGRAVED Stamps
  Scott 1431b... 8c Antarctic Treaty
  1958 Taiwan Locomotive stamp
  US Plate Block books options
  Some More Turkey for ID
  Distinctive Shades of the d Wallaroo
  USPS Stamp app questions
  Why do these Easter post cards have 2 different dates on their cancellations?
  Steedman's Soothing Powders stamp
  What Stamp Products Do You Wish Were Manufactured -- or Brought Back?
  Papua New Guinea 1953 Coronation flight cover
  Cancellations PAID (1884), TRIP (1899) and Niagara Falls
  Malaya Tigers Scott-SG Cross Reference
  Turkey Sc#77 Postmark or Overprint?
  Would like to review these 2 George Washington stamps design A140 with community
  Question - Interpreting Scott Specialized
  France 1c Scott #86 vs #87
  Question about high denomiated revenue stamps, EG R687
  Please Help to Identify Japanese Postmarks on Telegram Forms 1890's"

  Herd of Cattle? Bulls, Cows and Calves on Stamps
  What Stamp Products Do You Wish Were Manufactured -- or Brought Back?
  Why do these Easter post cards have 2 different dates on their cancellations?
  I'm going to attempt to post some pictures for help with value
  A Stamp for every Country collection
  Very scarce stamps that almost no collector knows (or cares?) about.
  Newfoundland 245 Cracked Plate
  Used USA stamps giveaway
  Question regarding "Fold-O-Hinge" Color
  1c 1851 Plate 1-Early Stamps
  Official Seal Intact on Cover
  Scott 1431b... 8c Antarctic Treaty
  Anthony's FAKE FRAUD COUNTERFEIT 315's and 321's...
  D.B.S.R - The Local Post of Kustendje and Czernawoda
  Newfoundland 254 Diagonal Lines
  Russian - more stamps - thanks
  Family on Stamps (Families)
  Canada Stamps : On Steiner pages.
  Dentistry or Oral Health Stamps
  Keep getting this error message when trying to post on SCF
  US Plate Block books options
  Valuers - am I so wrong?
  Canadian 'Admiral' Lathework printings
  The Stamps of Australia : On Steiner Pages.
  Website for converting cancels to read easier??

Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2018 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2005 - 2018 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.88 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05