Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

US 572 - Capitol Hill - Something seems wrong with this one  
 

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
155 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   6:12 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add ananthveerappan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
Folks - Let me know if this stamp looks alright - Seller claims NH but doesn't offer returns.

  • The Front scan shows a bend that is not visible from the back scan

  • The Plate number fonts seem off

  • It looks like a diagonal crease on the back - not mentioned in the sale description

  • Plate# ink spreads in the back seem off





Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
1074 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   6:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add bookbndrbob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The scanning failure creates the impression that there is a horizontal, post-printing crease on the stamp.

It appears to be careless work by the seller in presenting this image.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
1063 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   6:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The horizontal aberration which runs across above the dome is a shifting during scanning and is not a fault. But based on the diagonal mark on the reverse side, I would not buy it at any price.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by John Becker - 07/16/2017 9:17 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1600 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   6:26 pm  Show Profile Check disi123's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add disi123 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Is anyone sure the aberation across the face is a scanning error?

The OP has not addressed it...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Data Integrity Solutions ~ $1.7M in eBay Sales... Dell & HP Windows 7 and 8.1 in stock now...
http://stores.ebay.com/Data-Integrity-Solutions
Moderator
Learn More...
3616 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   6:31 pm  Show Profile Check 51studebaker's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add 51studebaker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, I am sure. Note the image distortion that is occurring beyond the stamps (on the sides). The stepper motor in the scanner double clutched.
Don
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
425 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   7:30 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hy-brasil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Most definitely a typical scanner error.

The diagonal crease is a gum crease, natural and common enough for the issue. It's heavy enough that if it hasn't creased through the stamp already, it will eventually.

Sellers don't point out flaws all the time, especially on eBay. Do you do that when selling your used car or appliance, especially when you don't know a problem is present? At least the seller was good enough to show the back to let the buyer decide. Some education and due diligence is necessary on the part of potential buyers.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4628 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   7:32 pm  Show Profile Check Petert4522's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Don, I agree with your diagnosis above. Years ago I used to service video printers and have seen that happen. My question: Why did it not show on the other scan?

Peter

PS. I am very well aware of all the weird things that electronics can do. You do not have to answer this question!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
3616 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   7:53 pm  Show Profile Check 51studebaker's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add 51studebaker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Peter,
My first thought was a power issue, a situation where the power glitched during the first scan (i.e. AC power surge, USB power may have hiccupped, etc.). Old scanners used to be belt driven...but these are just guesses. We would have to know the scanner model to narrow it down a bit more.
Don
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1489 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   7:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Mike33 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
He may have just bumped the scanner while scanning and didn't notice
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
2313 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   7:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jogil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The fact that the perforations look too close together on the distorted part of the front picture but not on the back picture points to a scanner imaging problem.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by jogil - 07/16/2017 7:58 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1715 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   9:02 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The distorted band seen on front is also on the back image, ending with the same odd perfs, but it is above the plate number.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by littleriverphil - 07/16/2017 9:05 pm
Valued Member
Netherlands
118 Posts
Posted 07/17/2017   02:38 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Dutch US Stamp Collector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
perhaps its just me, but looks like the plate number has moved from front to back scan? its closer to the edge
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
431 Posts
Posted 07/17/2017   06:58 am  Show Profile Check srailkb's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add srailkb to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The plate number size difference (larger "14", smaller "306") is normal for F14306. All examples from that plate will show this phenomenon.

The plate number on back is an offset, rather common on these flat plate issues.

The "bend" on front is definitely a scanning aberration.

The natural gum crease on back appears to be significant (damaging the paper as well). It should have been described by the seller and will lower the value of the stamp.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
155 Posts
Posted 07/17/2017   10:08 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add ananthveerappan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you folks...

The gum crease definitely brings down the value of this otherwise nice stamp. Great to know about that Plate Number and Ink Offset variance.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum Topics Recently Active Forum Topics
  Scott US 114 lifted from old album
  Something's not quite right about this narcotic stamp image
  Anyone Doing the Same?
  Scott Page Protectors for Lighthouse Pages
  Sc. 632 and 633 design vs. Nebr. and Kans. versions and Sc. 571 sizes
  Assistance required Identifying this Franklin 1 Cent
  Color Date Change Over
  Measuring Germany Mi 154 for fault?
  How would I start / continue to identify this 10 cent Jefferson?
  High quality scanner?
  Future Scott Catalogues
  What's going on with eBay? Width of stamps
  Italian Post Turkish Empire 1922 question
  U.S Fancy Cancels Help Needed
  China commemoratives for radio telescope
  Five Cent Beaver Leaping Fish Variety
  Austrian Cinderellas
  Beautiful cinderella from the British Esperanto Association
  UX38 uncut sheet of four
  Unknown Finnish stamp
  Someone told me my description is wrong
  The oldest known precancel
  Show Your Newly Acquired Covers Here
  Outbound Bill of Exchange from U.S. to Mexico
  If you think "More is better" check out this auction

  Wiki'd Buildings on Stamps
  Sc. 632 and 633 design vs. Nebr. and Kans. versions and Sc. 571 sizes
  Show us SNOW on stamps!
  Dave's (Oldtriguy1960) Canada Air Post Official wants
  UX38 uncut sheet of four
  How would I start / continue to identify this 10 cent Jefferson?
  Scott US 114 lifted from old album
  China commemoratives for radio telescope
  Scott Page Protectors for Lighthouse Pages
  Future Scott Catalogues
  Show us HOT AIR BALLOONS!
  Something's not quite right about this narcotic stamp image
  Baseball Topical Stamps
  Massive Cinderella Lots up for auction
  Anyone Doing the Same?
  Assistance required Identifying this Franklin 1 Cent
  1934 National Parks Series and 1935 Farley Reprints
  Morocco "Gloss Proofs"
  My newly acquired Clipper covers!
  275 "Did You Know?" Facts about Postage Stamps
  Color Date Change Over
  What's going on with eBay? Width of stamps
  Scott 709 - - oddity
  10 Red Cloud (Scott 2175)
  Trade Mail For covers

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2017 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2014 Stamp Community Forums Go To Top Of Page
It took 0.73 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05