Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

US 572 - Capitol Hill - Something seems wrong with this one  
 

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
187 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   6:12 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add ananthveerappan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
Folks - Let me know if this stamp looks alright - Seller claims NH but doesn't offer returns.

  • The Front scan shows a bend that is not visible from the back scan

  • The Plate number fonts seem off

  • It looks like a diagonal crease on the back - not mentioned in the sale description

  • Plate# ink spreads in the back seem off





Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
1179 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   6:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add bookbndrbob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The scanning failure creates the impression that there is a horizontal, post-printing crease on the stamp.

It appears to be careless work by the seller in presenting this image.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
1160 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   6:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The horizontal aberration which runs across above the dome is a shifting during scanning and is not a fault. But based on the diagonal mark on the reverse side, I would not buy it at any price.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by John Becker - 07/16/2017 9:17 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1631 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   6:26 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add disi123 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Is anyone sure the aberation across the face is a scanning error?

The OP has not addressed it...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
3954 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   6:31 pm  Show Profile Check 51studebaker's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add 51studebaker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, I am sure. Note the image distortion that is occurring beyond the stamps (on the sides). The stepper motor in the scanner double clutched.
Don
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
576 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   7:30 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hy-brasil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Most definitely a typical scanner error.

The diagonal crease is a gum crease, natural and common enough for the issue. It's heavy enough that if it hasn't creased through the stamp already, it will eventually.

Sellers don't point out flaws all the time, especially on eBay. Do you do that when selling your used car or appliance, especially when you don't know a problem is present? At least the seller was good enough to show the back to let the buyer decide. Some education and due diligence is necessary on the part of potential buyers.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4820 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   7:32 pm  Show Profile Check Petert4522's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Don, I agree with your diagnosis above. Years ago I used to service video printers and have seen that happen. My question: Why did it not show on the other scan?

Peter

PS. I am very well aware of all the weird things that electronics can do. You do not have to answer this question!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
3954 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   7:53 pm  Show Profile Check 51studebaker's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add 51studebaker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Peter,
My first thought was a power issue, a situation where the power glitched during the first scan (i.e. AC power surge, USB power may have hiccupped, etc.). Old scanners used to be belt driven...but these are just guesses. We would have to know the scanner model to narrow it down a bit more.
Don
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1503 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   7:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Mike33 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
He may have just bumped the scanner while scanning and didn't notice
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
2412 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   7:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jogil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The fact that the perforations look too close together on the distorted part of the front picture but not on the back picture points to a scanner imaging problem.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by jogil - 07/16/2017 7:58 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1866 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   9:02 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The distorted band seen on front is also on the back image, ending with the same odd perfs, but it is above the plate number.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by littleriverphil - 07/16/2017 9:05 pm
Valued Member
Netherlands
139 Posts
Posted 07/17/2017   02:38 am  Show Profile Check Dutch US Stamp Collector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Dutch US Stamp Collector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
perhaps its just me, but looks like the plate number has moved from front to back scan? its closer to the edge
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
473 Posts
Posted 07/17/2017   06:58 am  Show Profile Check srailkb's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add srailkb to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The plate number size difference (larger "14", smaller "306") is normal for F14306. All examples from that plate will show this phenomenon.

The plate number on back is an offset, rather common on these flat plate issues.

The "bend" on front is definitely a scanning aberration.

The natural gum crease on back appears to be significant (damaging the paper as well). It should have been described by the seller and will lower the value of the stamp.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
187 Posts
Posted 07/17/2017   10:08 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add ananthveerappan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you folks...

The gum crease definitely brings down the value of this otherwise nice stamp. Great to know about that Plate Number and Ink Offset variance.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum TopicsRecently Active Forum Topics
  Help with valuation of Newfoundland NFR2 & NFR3
  Slovakia - 2017 new issues:
  My profile photo - how to add it:
  Are These 2 Stanps Belgian Precancels?
  Compound perforations and control perfin on Schermack/Scott #392
  KGVI Black bars question
  10 cent Virgin Island Revenue Stamp circa 1958
  Airmail "Stamps" help
  Norway potato rationing instructions from WW2
  Strange Hinge Style, Any Info?
  Ukraine 1918 cover from Odessa
  Is this a 17 can someone help
  Azerbaijan to USA cover
  Nov. 24 QUIZ: How's Your Eye for Detail?
  Are these stamps authentic?
  Show your Commonwealth KGVI era and pictorial sets
  2 Chinese stamps that I can't identify
  Possible Indian letter and cancellation
  Postally used 94P5... to cert or not to cert...
  Is This Turkey Sc#47 A5 25pi Dull Rose - Or Have I Mis-Identified It?
  Chart for Homemade Steiner Pages
  Scott 27 6C LQ what a mess!
  Are these stamps and stamp cancellations?
  How to Detect Fakes and Forgeries On World Covers
  Are these even cosidered stamps..??

  Hanukkah stamps issued today (November 14th) and immediately recalled
  10 cent Virgin Island Revenue Stamp circa 1958
  KGVI Black bars question
  Australia Meter cutouts Overstamped Specimen
  Help with valuation of Newfoundland NFR2 & NFR3
  Are These 2 Stanps Belgian Precancels?
  Compound perforations and control perfin on Schermack/Scott #392
  Slovakia - 2017 new issues:
  Postally used 94P5... to cert or not to cert...
  My profile photo - how to add it:
  Have a Heart: - Not just on Valentine's Day
  Please Help to Identify Japanese Revenues & Documents 1890's?
  Latin Species Names For Plants & Animals
  Are these even cosidered stamps..??
  Airmail "Stamps" help
  Show your Commonwealth KGVI era and pictorial sets
  Making your own album pages for your collection?
  Status International Shipping Beware
  Japanese Revenue - Any info appreciated!
  I inherited my Uncle's huge collection of stamps, thought you might enjoy seeing some of it
  What Did You Do Philatelically: Today or Recently?
  Fairfax StampFest show for November 2017 has been CANCELLED
  Bill Steiner System Hacked
  Railway (Train) Stations on Stamps
  Are these stamps authentic?

Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2017 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2005 - 2017 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.81 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05