Author |
Replies: 20 / Views: 11,251 |
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1259 Posts |
|
Canada #654 100 anniversary of Guglielmo Marconi.  Greens face ??      David(DJD)
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
907 Posts |
|
This one was pretty hideous too, David...she looks like she has the pox...  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
USA
2736 Posts |
|
Now here is what you call ugly |
Send note to Staff
|
A Philatelic mind is a terrible thing to waste |
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1755 Posts |
|
Winnipegger Glenn:
I agree! The Jeanne Mance stamp is hideous! Yuck!
David |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1259 Posts |
|
Bobgggggggggggggggg The stamps are not bad for design. The subject is ugly. But in their day I suppose many thought they were gods. David |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Israel
6191 Posts |
|
At the risk of annoying all the Royalists, this is one of the most horrendous.......  Londonbus1.....Going into hiding shortly  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2757 Posts |
|
No, Don't tell me that a real issue from the UK. Why in the name, would anyone use pictures like that. The background is awful. Ok! so is the subject. These picture's are newspaper quality not how a national symbol/portrait should be displayed.
Mike
Mike |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1259 Posts |
|
re: the royals I always thought that the royal family had to approve the designs? maybe they did ? David (DJD) |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Valued Member
Netherlands
333 Posts |
|
re. the prince of Wales m/s: what happened to the colours? It is a terrible scan that makes the whole sheet look strange (you don't think prince Charles would really wear a greenish suit?) |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Israel
6191 Posts |
|
Jan-Simon,
Nothing wrong with the scan...that's how the sheet looks.
Believe me, it's the ugliest stamp in the world.
Londonbus1.....Doesn't have a green suit |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Valued Member
Netherlands
333 Posts |
|
I do not have it myself, but I found other pictures on the web that look rather different:  .com/Charles%20Royal%20Wedding%20MS%202005.jpg) The first picture looks as if the colour balance has been changed. |
Send note to Staff
|
Edited by Jan-Simon - 08/05/2009 08:14 am |
|
Valued Member
Netherlands
333 Posts |
|
By the way, I think that almost all Dutch stamps issued between 1967 and 1975 are far more ugly than any of the ones shown in this thread. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Israel
6191 Posts |
|
I'll check out some Dutch stamps shortly to compare. The colours on the scan I sent are just about right, and I remember at the time there was a lot of talk in the UK and on our GB group how tacky the colours were. It does not do either of them any favours that's for sure. If you go here you will see another scan on our GB group to compare. http://stampsofgb.multiply.com/phot...ed_in_2005#8Londonbus1.....off to look for the ugly Dutch !  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
59 Posts |
|
I have the miniature sheet of Prince Charles and Camilla in my collection - in real life it's a lot more like Jan's image! |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
59 Posts |
|
Valued Member
Netherlands
333 Posts |
|
Really? I think that Year of the Ram stamp is very beautiful. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, isn't it? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 20 / Views: 11,251 |
|