Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

anything seen on the reverse is of little consequence  
 

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
United States
538 Posts
Posted 10/12/2017   6:04 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add revenuermd to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I recently purchased a stamp for the cancel and when it arrived it had a substantial thin. When I questioned the owner I got the following response (in part):

"...when a stamp that is inexpensive and sold for the merit of the cancel, a condition that is only seen on the reverse is usually not described and of little consequence."

I would be curious how others might react to this response.
Send note to Staff
Ron Lesher

Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
2867 Posts
Posted 10/12/2017   6:14 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add redwoodrandy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Everything about a stamps condition is important to me in deciding whether I will purchase or not and in determining price.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1514 Posts
Posted 10/12/2017   6:43 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add bookbndrbob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The seller is either ignorant, or he/she is dishonest.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by bookbndrbob - 10/12/2017 6:44 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1021 Posts
Posted 10/12/2017   6:58 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add James Drummond to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
"...when a stamp that is inexpensive and sold for the merit of the cancel, a condition that is only seen on the reverse is usually not described and of little consequence."


A fault is still a fault, on everything, even if it has a shiny coat of paint on it.

The thin should have been mentioned.

Jim
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1006 Posts
Posted 10/12/2017   7:00 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add shermae to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Complete rubbish. If it's of no consequence, why not disclose the fault in the spirit of full disclosure? If it really doesn't matter, then there will be no problem selling it.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
Canada
5699 Posts
Posted 10/12/2017   7:27 pm  Show Profile Check BeeSee's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add BeeSee to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Complete BS. The full condition of the stamp should be described (or shown). It does not matter how inexpensive the stamp is.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
BeeSee in BC
"The Postmark is Mightier than the Stamp"
http://brcstamps.com ---- BNAPS, RPSC, APS
Pillar Of The Community
United States
807 Posts
Posted 10/12/2017   7:31 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Hal to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The response by the seller is total "b.s." I go with dishonest.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
3696 Posts
Posted 10/12/2017   7:42 pm  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I had Michael Aldrich tell me the same thing when I returned items from his auctions due to undisclosed faults: "Cancel collectors don't care about faults."

The **** they don't!

I will indeed buy faulty items if they have cancels, plate varieties, or other aspects I am interested in... HOWEVER, I factor the severity of the faults into what I am willing to pay.

Anyone trumpeting that line of **** has no ethics.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by revenuecollector - 10/12/2017 7:43 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5535 Posts
Posted 10/12/2017   9:53 pm  Show Profile Check Petert4522's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Would it do any good to report this to tha ASDA?

Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1641 Posts
Posted 10/13/2017   12:02 am  Show Profile Check sinclair2010's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add sinclair2010 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I've been told the same thing about plate varieties with condition issues. In fact, my pointing out of a major defect on a stamp was publicly ridiculed and broadcasted over SAN. It is total BS. When all else is equal, a sound stamp will sell for more than a defective stamp every time. It's no more complicated than that.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
472 Posts
Posted 10/13/2017   05:33 am  Show Profile Check paperhistory's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add paperhistory to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It's a commonly held view, and I've even seen it from some auctioneers, though in fairness they disclose at the head of the section that they don't call faults on the cancels.

Commonly held or not, I agree it should be disclosed or the policy stated.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
785 Posts
Posted 10/13/2017   06:57 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rustyc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Ditto to what everyone has said above. The seller deserves negative feedback that includes a warning to prospective buyers.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
4929 Posts
Posted 10/13/2017   06:59 am  Show Profile Check 51studebaker's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add 51studebaker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Ethically this is lame in my opinion.

Legally, any terms and conditions must be communicated before the transaction is done; adding/changing terms and conditions after the transaction is complete is against the law (at least in the state and country I live in).
Don
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1649 Posts
Posted 10/14/2017   10:14 pm  Show Profile Check eyeonwall's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add eyeonwall to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
agree with paperhistory (although commonly held may be overstating it)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4705 Posts
Posted 10/14/2017   10:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Actually it is a fairly common opinion. Like most philatelic areas, the scarcer the variety or cancel is, the less the back matters, but it always means something and should always be disclosed.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
17 Posts
Posted 10/16/2017   09:45 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add ericjackson to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Faults do matter and must always be disclosed. To ignore this fact is asking for trouble and who needs that.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Promoting the integrity of internet philatelic dealers. Please join us so buyers can buy with confidence.United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum TopicsRecently Active Forum Topics
  Finland Q15 Doubled Denomination
  unable to find anything about thses
  GB 1847 6d embossed-CV 18,000 ($23,700) Filler-Value ?.
  US Prexie 842 with small holes
  3c washington grill identity
  Wilding Graphite Lines
  Newfoundand R36a - roller mark
  U.S. 1857 3c Washington - S.C. #26 or #26A?
  Is this a US A157 (d. perf. 10 at top or bottom) scott#554
  I need help identifying this stamp
  Here's one from everyone's favorite eBay seller...
  3 cent Washington with cover - valuable?
  Philatelic Items Free of US Customs Duty
  Interesting doubling on text of Scott # RE147 wine stamp
  Would You Breakup This Block?
  U.S. 1860s 15c Lincoln - Grill Identification - Odd left 11 perforation
  Great Americans Stamps Without gums?
  Japan Classics opinions
  U.S. 3c Washington (No Grill) Perf 12 S.C. #207 - No frame line under 3 - Added value?
  Stamp Identification Wanted
  U.S. ~1870 3c Washington (No grill) Perf 12 - Identification please
  U.S. S.C. #599a Perf 10 - Please verify identification
  Grandmother's stamp accumulation
  Nice uncut example of R189 with interesting handstamp cancel
  Separating sheets of stamps

  Wilding Graphite Lines
  GB 1847 6d embossed-CV 18,000 ($23,700) Filler-Value ?.
  The Stamps of Turkey : On Steiner Pages.
  New South Wales Perfin OS-NSW
  Great Britain : On Steiner pages.
  Philatelic Items Free of US Customs Duty
  U.S. 1857 3c Washington - S.C. #26 or #26A?
  There is a fungus among us.
  unable to find anything about thses
  Here's one from everyone's favorite eBay seller...
  Finland Q15 Doubled Denomination
  US Prexie 842 with small holes
  Canada Post celebrates 65th anniversary of queen's coronation April 20
  Arches, Columns & Gates on Stamps
  3c washington grill identity
  The 100,000 stamp club
  Stamps with WORDS and/or NUMBERS as the main design
  Japan Classics opinions
  Federal Duck Stamps
  Let's see your most recently purchased stamps
  What do you do with kiloware leftovers?
  Herd of Cattle? Bulls, Cows and Calves on Stamps
  Modern Industrial Art and Design
  Man, it's rough getting old... and Michel isn't helping matters any.
  More horrible changes to eBay -- reconfigured want list

Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2018 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2005 - 2018 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.78 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05