Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Are These Very Rare Stamps?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 2,148Next Topic  
New Member

United States
1 Posts
Posted 02/05/2018   11:53 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add rrmichael to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I have over 200 stamps with scott numbers and values of several thousands of $$$. These were marked with substantial value. I know nothing about stamps, so wondering if anyone can verify? The individual picture I was told is a 482A. Can anyone verify that by the picture? I have now put two more pics of what is listed as rare 544 and 498g






Send note to Staff
Edited by rrmichael - 02/05/2018 1:12 pm

Pillar Of The Community
Canada
4610 Posts
Posted 02/05/2018   12:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Bujutsu to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi and welcome to the forum.

If possible, could you scan a number of them individually? The types of stamps you have shown are known with different perforations and watermarks etc. A good site to check what you have would be here - -

http://stampsmarter.com/1847usa/1847Home.html

This site is thorough and well worth looking into.

Hope this helps?

Chimo

Bujutsu
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
4908 Posts
Posted 02/05/2018   12:18 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Welcome to the forum.
The quick answer is "probably not".
And here's why The stamps you show were the workhorse stamps of their era. They were issued in the billions, but have some rare and scarce varieties which are sought after. (Think winning the lottery odds) The first two stamps you show are such examples and are very likely to be the more common varieties mis-identified (whether intentionally or by wishful thinking). The third stamp isn't the correct stamp design to be a 482a, so that one cannot be right and casts doubt on the others.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
4908 Posts
Posted 02/05/2018   12:53 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Now with the addition of an individual scan of the red stamp above, it can be identified as a Scott 577 with Schermack type III vending machine perforations added to it (the rectangular slots along the right side). Value is 1.25 in the 2011 Scott Specialized catalog.

(Gentle suggestion, please add/edit to the end of the thread so the posts stay in a chronological sequence for followers - and it makes the progressive replies make sense.)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by John Becker - 02/05/2018 12:54 pm
Rest in Peace
United States
205 Posts
Posted 02/05/2018   12:59 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Tipzi to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
You can safely ignore the catalogue numbers completely. The supposed #482A is a #577 with the Schermack Type III perforations on one side, as John pointed out, worth about 50 cents. The other two stamps are common with 10-gauge perforations but ultra-rare with 11-gauge perforations; these look to be the common gauge 10.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2494 Posts
Posted 02/05/2018   1:38 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add chasa to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I wonder who 'told' you about these stamps. Do not, repeat, do not, buy a bridge from this person !
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1145 Posts
Posted 02/05/2018   2:44 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
2nd Pic: as stated 577 w/Schermack Private Perfs.; 3rd Pic: 424 or 462; 4th Pic: 498. Not much value to them. The "594" and "613" pictured in the 1st pic.; they won't be what they are stated to be either.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Al E. Gator - 02/05/2018 2:47 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 2,148Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2023 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2023 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.15 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05