Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

GB Letter posted in 1835 but no sign of stamp  
 

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Valued Member

United Kingdom
176 Posts
Posted 02/13/2018   3:53 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Eiger to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
Edited. Of course there's no stamp it was before stamps started Oops
Very interesting nevertheless

This is a letter quaintly folded into an envelope and posted. There's a postal cancellation Newbury, 1835 and the letter is hand written and dated 18th November 1835.
There's what appears to be a handwritten 'sign'.
Thanks





Send note to Staff
Edited by Eiger - 02/13/2018 4:16 pm

Pillar Of The Community
France, Metropolitan
859 Posts
Posted 02/13/2018   4:02 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add perf12 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
What ! The first stamp dates from 1840,and your cover looks like 1845
stampless cover with manuscript rate.Stampless cover were common in this
period of transition to stamped covers in all countries.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
176 Posts
Posted 02/13/2018   4:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Eiger to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It's definitely 1835 both as the hand written date inside and the Newbury cancellation. Yes of course the first stamp was 1840 I forgot :)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
2307 Posts
Posted 02/13/2018   4:20 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Eiger,

If this is 1835 then it's before the introduction of the uniform penny post and the first postage stamps in 1840.

Newbury to Hungerford is about 10 miles or so.

I believe the relevant rate in 1835 would have been 4d for up to 15 miles so I guess the handwritten mark is "4".


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Nigel
Valued Member
United Kingdom
176 Posts
Posted 02/13/2018   4:32 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Eiger to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Nigel! It's such lovely handwriting. And considering how old it is in such good condition. A lovely edition to my collection of very old QV bits and pieces
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
176 Posts
Posted 02/13/2018   4:35 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Eiger to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Interestingly 'Envelopes were rarely used prior to 1840 as this would be considered a second item of paper and thus invoke a double rate charge'
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
2307 Posts
Posted 02/13/2018   4:47 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, that's a good point, and even fourpence would have been a significant expense for ordinary folk to pay.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Nigel
Valued Member
Australia
224 Posts
Posted 02/13/2018   8:37 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Bobby De La Rue to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes rated 4d. Postal clerk's handwriting in those times often leaves a lot to be desired.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
195 Posts
Posted 02/13/2018   11:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add aug-stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
"fourpence would have been a significant expense for ordinary folk to pay"

On this one, I suspect the payment was made by the recipient, on delivery ...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
176 Posts
Posted 02/14/2018   01:35 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Eiger to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes that's right in those days the receiver paid the postage.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
946 Posts
Posted 02/14/2018   03:50 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add shermae to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
This letter would not fit in a QV collection as she took the throne in 1837.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
176 Posts
Posted 02/14/2018   07:36 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Eiger to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
well, my early collection :)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
749 Posts
Posted 02/14/2018   12:37 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Kimo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Given the volume of mail and that rates were normally handwritten at that time postal clerks developed stylized versions of numbers that could be written exceptionally fast such as this one that is not much more than a squiggle. After some practice they are easier for an ordinary person to decipher. Especially the ones that have fractional rates where a 1/2 can be written in one quick continuous squiggle.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum TopicsRecently Active Forum Topics
  Definitely a 594, not sure if I have a 596
  Stamp Identification
  not too fancy? looking for a crash course in cancellations please advise
  Another book ! Anyone have it ? About bc and vancouver island
  Aussie Digger 1917 Mail Home
  The vagaries of eBay...can't be explained
  Can you precisely identify this 15c Webster without seeing the real stamp, please?
  Two More Anthony's Gems
  A Bluish Paper 361 From Anthony's
  Anthony's Particularly Ridiculous 317
  Great Britain Mulready-like envelopes
  I am looking for new stamps 2018
  NFLD Scott 262 - "Rock on ice" variety
  What are these artworks of proposed stamps? Essays? copies? reprints??
  Romania - WWI German Occupation - Unknown Stamp
  Help Identify Australian Postage Due Variety?
  Scott 41 - "bruise on neck"
  Error Perforation Stamps Yes or No?
  Stamp Community Family Logo link
  Old Stamps but Really New
  My UK postal stamps collection.
  ASDA Chicago Midwest Show
  Cameroun 1946 Scott 304/SG 232 strange marks
  Train stations around the world.
  Another newbie here with the usual question about the 1 cent Franklins-is this the standard issue?

  Definitely a 594, not sure if I have a 596
  Selection Stamps~and you thought gum was tacky.
  Aussie Digger 1917 Mail Home
  Thematic : Umbrellas on Stamps.
  not too fancy? looking for a crash course in cancellations please advise
  Cravat on postal stamps
  Stamps of the Olympics Games through the centuries
  Stamp Identification
  Can you precisely identify this 15c Webster without seeing the real stamp, please?
  Lets see your Aviation Stamps
  Do youngsters collect stamps today ?
  Show us SNOW on stamps!
  Two More Anthony's Gems
  I am looking for new stamps 2018
  The vagaries of eBay...can't be explained
  Transportation Coil caboose 1905 Trying to understand Untagged variation
  perf 11 us franklin/washington coils
  Anthony's Particularly Ridiculous 317
  John Ash Imprints - show Yours
  Lakes, Marshes, Mangroves, and Wetlands on stamps
  Another book ! Anyone have it ? About bc and vancouver island
  Great Britain Mulready-like envelopes
  NFLD Scott 262 - "Rock on ice" variety
  Rockford 2-3-4 Stamp Expo - MArch 10-11, 2018
  A Bluish Paper 361 From Anthony's

Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2018 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2005 - 2018 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.25 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05