Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Continental Issues - Silk Fibers

 
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 4
Valued Member
United States
182 Posts
Posted 01/09/2019   09:59 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add AJ Valente to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I was referring to products of Continential BNC. That is, images of banknote stamps.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1698 Posts
Posted 01/11/2019   2:37 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add essayk to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The color match with the printing ink certainly must give one pause. What is the probability that rags stained with that ink found their way to the paper manufacturer?

Since the stamps were printed on plain paper and manually gummed by brush afterward, have you determined how to distinguish slight offsetting ("setoffs" actually), from sliding the sheets onto a stack prior to gumming, versus actual colored fiber impurities in the paper itself?


@AJ Valente: Alan, this is a real question, not a challenge. Is it likely that prior to the consolidation both Continental and American were getting security paper stock for postage stamps at the same time from one supplier, particularly when one was under contract with the Government and the other was not? What is the evidence available to us to nail that down?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by essayk - 01/11/2019 2:39 pm
Valued Member
United States
182 Posts
Posted 01/12/2019   09:14 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add AJ Valente to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
essayk, Its a long shot, but not very different to a slight offset seen on some issues. The fibers could have been roughed up or even airborne. After printing they picked-up some fresh ink from the sheet directly below. The sheets were then gummed and pressed to prevent curling. In that case the individual fibers would have been pressed home, appearing a part of the paper matrix.

As to your other question, I would say Yes and No. There were in essence two separate offices. One was the production office where the stamps were manufactured. The other office was the engraving department.

The engraving office used paper from various sources. For instance, there is one reference in the Travers papers (~1872) to a thin paper obtained from the Housatonic Mill in Berkshire County MA. This one owned by the Owen Paper Company (long story there), but they were not a Government contractor so far as I know.

As for the production facility, they only got paper from the approved source (a contractor known and approved by the Government). There were times of course where special dispensation was granted, such as the case with double paper. There's another letter (Feb '78) in the Travers papers outlining a two sets of printed stock (old and new papers) sent to the Government for chemical testing of cancelling inks.

Hope that helps.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by AJ Valente - 01/12/2019 09:16 am
Page: of 4 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2019 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2019 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.33 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05