Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Scott 1511 Tagged Or Not?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 657Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
64 Posts
Posted 03/18/2019   10:06 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Alan B to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I have a sheet of the Scott 1511 - Zip Code stamp that is block tagged. However my 2017 Scott Specialized doesn't say anything about tagging. It does show 1509 and 1510 as tagged, as well as the next stamp after, 1518. Has Scott just omitted noting that the stamp is tagged, or do I have an oddity?

Thanks.
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
673 Posts
Posted 03/19/2019   03:02 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add ClassicPhilatelist to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It's tagged. Scott does mention it. Look at the description under the design. It applies to those designs, implicitly following, and their respective Scott #s. Page 137 2019 Scott Specialized.

It reads: 1973 - 1974 tagged perf 11 x 101/2

Scott Specialized 2017 says the same thing, page 138.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
9761 Posts
Posted 03/19/2019   03:08 am  Show Profile Check 51studebaker's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add 51studebaker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The best reference for US tagged stamps, shows 5 different types of block tagging on #1511
http://stampsmarter.com/features/TaggingView.html

Don
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
64 Posts
Posted 03/23/2019   9:39 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Alan B to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Don,

Thank you for that link. That is very helpful!

Classic - thank you for your response. I thought that was probably the case, but, since it was printed in a completely different manner (Photogravure - Andreotti vs. Rotary Press), I wasn't sure.

Alan
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
673 Posts
Posted 03/24/2019   11:55 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add ClassicPhilatelist to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Alan,
Yeah the Scott Catalog can be a bit vague sometimes. Their comment about tagging applies to all the stamps in the block they are showing just above it.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 657Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2021 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2021 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.12 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05