Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Do You Think That This Revenue Bisect Is Genuine?

 
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1476 Posts
Posted 05/30/2019   8:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add James Drummond to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Send note to Staff

Valued Member
United States
302 Posts
Posted 05/30/2019   9:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rismoney to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Why is the half stamp not have a cancel extending onto the card. Seems suspect. The other SOTN seems a good candidate for transfer to this. My guess is stamps were damaged and bisect usage is a really good way to manufacture value where there is none.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
436 Posts
Posted 05/30/2019   9:42 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Moyock13 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
So, I just shuffled through several CDV's on eBay and those that had a hand stamp cancel no ink transfered to the card. Was it the practice to hand stamp cancel tax stamps prior to sticking them on the CDV? Seems suspicious to me.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6023 Posts
Posted 05/30/2019   11:32 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It was often the practice to handstamp revenues before use. Prevented theft that way. Remember, the tax was paid when the stamps were purchased. After that it was up to the taxpayer to use them correctly, but pre-canceling them was not a problem. Unless legal action was taken, no one saw them except the people directly involved.
Having said that, I have serious doubts as the validity of this "bisect". The cancels do not appear to match, the bisect portion appears to small, and it sets off alarm bells because of this.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
3242 Posts
Posted 05/31/2019   12:11 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It is actually a quadsect.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6023 Posts
Posted 05/31/2019   07:10 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Since there is no such thing aa a two and a half cent rate at the time, there is no reason for a quadrisect.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
4531 Posts
Posted 05/31/2019   07:19 am  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I agree with Bart's assessment.

Determining legitimacy of bisects on CDVs is very difficult, as:

1. Photographers were so prone to precanceling stamps (CDVs were frequently stored by stacking them, making wet cancel ink likely to offset onto the CDV above or below it, hence the prevalent use of precancels, both handstamped and manuscript).

2. Determining the actual rate due is frequently difficult and nonapparent, unlike with financial instruments. The tax rate would depend on the cost, which isn't explicitly stated, and could include several factors, including type of photo, size of photo, hand tinting services, etc. Also, while nominally illegal, photographers would frequently "gang" revenue stamps paying the tax on a group of CDVs onto one or two CDVs of the group rather than applying the specific tax to each individual CDV. In a vacuum, you don't necessarily know what the revenue stamps were explicitly paying for, and therefore what the tax amount should be.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by revenuecollector - 05/31/2019 07:25 am
Valued Member
United States
7 Posts
Posted 06/01/2019   11:15 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcanman to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The hand precancelling was probably not so much as a theft prevention measure for photographers as it was a solution to avoid ink offsets on the face of card photos, which were routinely stacked like baseball cards. No intelligent person would pay more than a few bucks for this cdv and no expertizer would bless it as a bisect.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2019 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2019 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.56 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05