Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

The Fifty-Five Cent Whimsy

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 1 / Views: 637Next Topic  
Rest in Peace
United States
4052 Posts
Posted 09/26/2019   4:52 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add ikeyPikey to your friends list Get a Link to this Message

From the New York Times:

In its Sept. 13 decision, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that the rate increase failed to meet the Administrative Procedure Act's "requirement for reasoned decision making." In fact, the reason the Postal Service gave when challenged in court by a frequent adversary, a California lawyer named Douglas Carlson, was close to bizarre. It needed to keep the price of stamps "at round numbers divisible by five," it asserted, for the sake of the "simplicity of structure" required by the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act.

This did not go over well with the judicial panel. "By its plain terms, the statute refers to the simplicity of the pricing schedule as a whole," Judge Neomi Rao wrote in the unanimous opinion. "It is not a provision about simple consumer prices, as suggested by the Postal Service." Judge Rao quoted with approval Mr. Carlson's arguments that consumers "may not appreciate the supposed 'convenience' of a higher price" and that "the public had never struggled to understand the price of stamps, even though that price had not been divisible by five for most of the nation's history."

The full text decision can be found at:


/s/ ikeyPikey
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
596 Posts
Posted 09/26/2019   4:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add modernstamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 1 / Views: 637Next Topic  
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2022 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2022 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.12 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05