Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Definitely An "Ugly Duckling" But I Love It Anyway!

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
4684 Posts
Posted 12/07/2019   9:01 pm  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this topic Add revenuecollector to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
At CHICAGOPEX last month, I stopped by Labron Harris's booth and asked whether he had any illegal usages of revenues as postage available, and he said "I've got an ugly one, but you might like it."

Well, he was right on both counts. Definitely not for the condition purist, as it has considerable... "character."

It's a 1st Issue 5-cent Inland Exchange (R27c) used illegally as postage on an 1876 cover to England, caught, and assessed postage due, currently the earliest example that Labron has seen of UPU "X and O" postage due markings. It is the first cover showcased in his September 2019 American Philatelist article "Early U.P.U. Treatment of Invalid Postage".

I won't post the entire article, but I will quote the first 5 paragraphs of the article, as they relate specifically to this cover:


Quote:
Tic-Tac-Toe is a game people have played for generations a game of "X"s and "O"s played within a grid of perpendicular lines. Three "O"s or "X"s in a straight line wins the game. In the years after the formation in 1874 of the organization that standardized international postal rates the Universal Postal Union (UPU) participating countries had another use for these letters.

If someone tried to send a letter without the proper postage of the country it was being sent from, a postal clerk would place one or more "O"s around the perimeter of the stamp to show it was invalid. After a few years, they also began using "X"s to indicate this invalidity, along with drawing lines around the stamp for the same purpose. The clerk, after invalidating the stamps, would mark the cover with the appropriate postage due markings and it would enter the mailstream and be sent on.

During the period of the covers shown here, the postage due rate was double the deficiency or amount short paid. I have accumulated these covers for many years, and this article illustrates various usages of these markings on covers.

The cover in Figure 1 is the earliest use I have seen to date, and it falls under the category of "ugly, but scarce". Even a professional restorer would have trouble making it look presentable. It is a first-year usage under the UPU postage due rules. It was franked with a 5 Inland Revenue stamp to pay the 5 UPU rate, and mailed from Shirley Village, Massachusetts, to England.

Upon reaching New York, it was first accepted as fully prepaid, indicated by the orange-red "NEW YORK P.O" transit marking. The revenue stamp was subsequently noticed and a New York postal clerk placed the blue "O" to the left of the stamp to show that it was invalid for postage, applied the "T" in a circle to show postage due and a black New York cancel was placed on the reverse to show the postage was not paid. Upon reaching England, it received the bold black "5d" marking to show the postage due amount (double the short paid amount, 2 pence being the English UPU rate, imposed as a penalty for underpaying the correct fee by using a postally invalid stamp). The cover at last arrived in Leamington, England, July 1, 1876.


Send note to Staff
Edited by revenuecollector - 12/08/2019 09:49 am

Bedrock Of The Community
Learn More...
Australia
28077 Posts
Posted 12/08/2019   04:37 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I never see "Ugly" in covers like these, I see history,
As an archaeologist digging up bones and shards, not ugly, but links to the past.

Wonderful story, and once again, never knew the existence of circles around stamps, I would have thought a doodle.
That cover has continued to educate a hundred and more years after it was sent.
Thanks for posting.
11 days seems to me smart work in transit.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 12/08/2019 04:42 am
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
4684 Posts
Posted 12/13/2019   2:00 pm  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
An earlier 1876 example on a mourning cover with similar markings, but much nicer aesthetics, just hammered at Schuyler Rumsey. I bid, but was blown out of the water. Including the juice, it came in at $517.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Learn More...
Australia
28077 Posts
Posted 12/13/2019   4:10 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
As it happened, I was browsing my Australian Postage dues yesterday,
and saw this cover with a circle.
I wondered if the "circle theory" extended to Australia?

Cover image and ownership : Tony Mac SCF
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
4684 Posts
Posted 12/13/2019   5:35 pm  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Was Australia part of the UPU at that time? If so, then likely yes.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Learn More...
Australia
28077 Posts
Posted 12/13/2019   7:17 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks,
absolutely, Australia UPU 1907

Aaah! darn it, just seen my error...That zero is part of 10d overwriting 8d due
Sorry.
But still interesting.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 12/13/2019 7:19 pm
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2020 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2020 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.48 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05