but I think it is unfair to show the Stanley gibbons advert of teens of years ago in an article about scams. Are you suggesting they are lying?
If you cannot see behind the advertisement, then I'd suggest you have a romanticised opinion of British Company you feel you need to protect.
That page shows a selected result of one stamp, no that is not lying, however it suggests that anyone buying into that scheme is going to get a similar result.
It is advertising for business in a sly manner.
No company, no matter what its history has been, how big, Royal warrant or not, is beyond investigation and transparency.
Our big Australian Banks, for years defied investigation, finally when they could no longer resist the public, it was shown they had been charging deceased customers from their accounts for years.
Lets join the very British mantra... "Let right be done"
Rog: Your first link does not work. Thanks for the other link.
As far as I am concerned SG produce high quality catalogues
No argument there, It's not my preferred choice catalogue, but for Commonwealth countries, it is unsurpassed.
These investment schemes play off the respect, people have for these productions.