Author |
Replies: 262 / Views: 7,781 |
|
Pillar Of The Community
2755 Posts |
|
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
3490 Posts |
|
Pillar Of The Community

829 Posts |
|
Im still stumped. pl33 has a G error listed in Stanley Gibbons QV Spec. cat. Mine does not have that. Also, my H seems to have and inward sloping right lower leg. I dont see that on 33. Also the rays & crosses seem off between mine & pl33?? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
3490 Posts |
|
Valid points.
The right lower leg, I am not sure whether it slopes inward or has become weak giving that appearance. I am not completely convinced the G error is not visible in your example. The Specialised is not very detailed about plate repairs. There is some weakness near the right check letter. I do not know if it is wear, or repair by re-entry that can cause such weakness and affects the letters.
From the suggested plates, this is the only one that has the H even close to yours, both in size, position - and especially the alignment with "ONE PENNY" - and serifs. The G is also close and certainly not worse than other examples. The frame lines match. I cannot say it is not plate 33, but it is a much better match than the other suggestions.
I looked at some other plates from around the same time but see no plates coming close.
The top left diagonal element in the right star, also is a closest match. |
Send note to Staff
|
Edited by NSK - 03/14/2023 2:38 pm |
|
Pillar Of The Community
2755 Posts |
|
I had another look at the plate 33 and 36 imprimatur sheets just now.
If it were my stamp I'd be saying plate 36. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

829 Posts |
|
ok, I've moved on. The HG was hurting me  . But im calling it a pl36 for now. I have this IK. I have found 1 or 2 close plates, BUT nothing like the NE star of pl1b which would make this a red printing from a black plate. Stathams book does say there is the NE star error from pl1 that carried over. Also, the NE side weakness is there too... Pl 1b??  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
2755 Posts |
|
Pillar Of The Community

829 Posts |
|
Tks Bobby. crease aside, yes - I was hoping.... The ray flay, weal corner and letters are all good I think. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

829 Posts |
|
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
3490 Posts |
|
Bedrock Of The Community

Australia
38679 Posts |
|
Postmark : 3-1-1-3 ? 116 BRECON perhaps. Unlisted in database.
Brecon archaically known as Brecknock, is a market town in Powys, mid Wales. In 1841, it had a population of 5,701.
|
Send note to Staff
|
Edited by rod222 - 03/19/2023 8:47 pm |
|
Pillar Of The Community

829 Posts |
|
This is all I found so far... Top bar of 1844 missing??  |
Send note to Staff
|
Edited by Stamps4Life - 03/19/2023 9:51 pm |
|
Bedrock Of The Community

Australia
38679 Posts |
|
Tough call. Thickness of numerals would suggest 1860 But thin bars suggest 1844 I'll sit on the fence. Love your Pmk images, from whence do you get those?
|
Send note to Staff
|
Edited by rod222 - 03/19/2023 10:43 pm |
|
Pillar Of The Community
2755 Posts |
|
It'll be the 1844 cancel. If it were 1860 the stamp would be perforated.
The images come from Parmenter's work.
Brecon is a delightful place. Mrs DLR & I had a wonderful time there! |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community

Australia
38679 Posts |
|
Quote: It'll be the 1844 cancel. If it were 1860 the stamp would be perforated.
Applause! The value of the specialist  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 262 / Views: 7,781 |
|