Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Bird Of Paradise Freak On A Magazine Reply Card

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 646Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
United States
593 Posts
Posted 09/08/2020   3:54 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Linus to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Today I will share with the club a reply card, from my postal history collection, saved out of the trash can years ago. This is USA Scott #3310 from the 1999 tropical flowers self-adhesive booklet with an error in the perforations on the right side, lopping off about a third of the normal stamp. In the second scan closeup, I show my freak stamp on top and a normal stamp on the bottom, for comparison.

Also, this was mailed from zip code 20601...Waldorf, Maryland, USA.

Linus








Send note to Staff
Edited by Linus - 09/08/2020 4:05 pm

Pillar Of The Community
United States
3199 Posts
Posted 09/09/2020   2:12 pm  Show Profile Check eyeonwall's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add eyeonwall to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
somewhere I have a cover with a misperf on one of the stamps from this issue, but memory says it is less severe than the one you show.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
593 Posts
Posted 09/09/2020   2:37 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Linus to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
eyeonwall - If you come across it, I would like to see it.

I remember the first time I saw my clipped bird of paradise, I thought the USPS had issued a new version of this stamp in a smaller booklet form. It is the same size as other USA booklet stamps that are smaller, and it looks like a valid stamp issue. Perhaps someone at the printing facility put a tropical flowers sheet into the wrong perforator machine, set up to cut smaller booklets? I wonder what the whole booklet and booklet cover looked like, perhaps the wrong cover? Was this printer's waste that was pilfered out of the plant?

All questions I have wondered about, over the years.

Linus
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 646Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2023 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2023 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.14 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05