Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Three US Lawmakers Call On USPS To Freeze Oshkosh Vehicle Contract

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 392Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
6820 Posts
Posted 03/09/2021   5:19 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add rogdcam to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
As a follow-up to a previous topic regarding new USPS vehicles:

https://www.autonews.com/technology...ero-headline
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
2501 Posts
Posted 03/11/2021   05:23 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hy-brasil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Where were those wackos during the review process for awarding the contract? There is already a requirement to have part of the fleet electric (no percentage of total found) and for vehicles to be able to be retrofitted to electric as the tech improves.

This just delays the whole replacement process further, where USPS already has had to replace completely dead Grummans with non-electric mini-vans. A familiar sight around here is a Grumman postal vehicle on a flatbed tow truck.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
3151 Posts
Posted 03/11/2021   05:56 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add angore to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I am not sure how a term of "whackos" applies but given the value it is not unexpected that some would challenge the decision. If the decision went another way, another group would challenge.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Al
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
6820 Posts
Posted 03/11/2021   07:29 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The Government wrote the performance/technical requirements of the Contract and the bidders did exactly what they were asked in order to not be thrown out as non-responsive. Now "somebody" comes along to question everything? So typical and one reason why Federal contractors build in extra monies or are aggressive Change Order pursuers.

One reason why all electric was not pursued in the Government RFP was that there was no budget for the estimated additional 6 billion dollars needed to fulfill that requirement not to mention all of the infrastructure upgrades necessary to accommodate charging the vehicles. Hey, its only money and they are printing it at a record clip.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
9772 Posts
Posted 03/11/2021   08:31 am  Show Profile Check 51studebaker's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add 51studebaker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I really do not understand the point of EVs (electric vehicles) although I admit I like the looks and performance of some of the hot ones.

Being eco-friendly is much more than just what comes out of the tailpipe but many folks seem to ignore this fact. The manufacturing of EVs can produce more CO2 than internal combustion vehicles due to the batteries. For example PoleStar recently acknowledged that its PoleStar 2 has a 26-ton carbon footprint from the factory which is higher than its sister company's Volvo gasoline powered HC40 SUV manufacturing footprint. And then you also have the planned obsolescence of EVs (batteries being as costly to replace as the value of the car) and the impact of the battery disposal. And of course during its lifetime you have to charge your EV and are consuming the carbon footprint that comes with that. Meanwhile China, with their environmental history, has already locked up vast amounts of the lithium battery industry.
Don
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 392Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2021 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2021 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.13 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05