Author |
Replies: 23 / Views: 610 |
Valued Member
United States
269 Posts |
|
This 209 recently sold on eBay w/ PSAG cert. IMO, it is the same stamp that was previously sent in to the PF. Any thoughts?   
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
673 Posts |
|
Many similarities. But also differences. Why punch out the unpunched perforation? And the top left corner perforation does not fit. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
3467 Posts |
|
right and bottom perfs are clearly the same. Reperfed at top and left to improve centering! |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

5933 Posts |
|
There is a reason why Rupp and Siegel do not deal in PSAG certs unless it is absolutely unavoidable. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
655 Posts |
|
I agree with others. Bottom and right sides match, undeniably. PSE blew it.
Edited: Because Top isn't Bottom! |
Send note to Staff
|
Edited by mootermutt987 - 04/06/2021 5:22 pm |
|
Pillar Of The Community

5933 Posts |
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1093 Posts |
|
I was concerned about some PSAG certs in the recent Kelleher auction (#755). There was one I'm forgetting which that was certed as unused, but looked like a lightened cancel. The ones I remember were about color. Lot 1204 - claimed to be a bright red brown- and lot 1228 - claimed to be a violet 70c. The colors just didn't look right on those. I know one can't trust the screen for color, but I just didn't trust the cert either. Do you guys think those look correct? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Valued Member
United States
182 Posts |
|
The bottom perfs have been altered as well. Check the 4th perf tip from the left, the slant direction changed. As to the right side, some of the perf tip fibers have been removed. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

5933 Posts |
|
Pillar Of The Community

5933 Posts |
|
rlsny - I would not touch any of the stamps that you reference without a PF cert. Problem is that those lots you pointed out have new certs that preclude the lots being placed on extension. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

5933 Posts |
|
Here is a PSAG certified Scott US 70c from Kelleher Sale 755:  It clearly is not mint as per PSAG and the lot description. It has a not so lightened (more like faded) pen cancel. I should note that it was not sold. But how on earth did PSAG call it out as mint and how did it end up in the catalog? Lot 1225 https://stampauctionnetwork.com/V/v75562.cfm |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1093 Posts |
|
Pillar Of The Community

5933 Posts |
|
PSAG calling that stamp mint is really bad. It makes you wonder how much deep diving and attention to detail they would put into something far less obvious. Kelleher listing it is right up there on the badness scale. When is the last time anyone can remember seeing something like that in a Siegel sale. The funniest part is that they did find it to be regummed! |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Valued Member

United States
195 Posts |
|
craigk - Good eye! Thanks for exposing another reperfed stamp being pawned off as genuine.
I am not a dealer, but the opinion I express here is based upon many conversations with dealers who have been in the business for decades. It appears to me that there are a few fairly well known wholesale distributors who serve as middlemen for these stamp doctors, and for some reason, nobody is anxious to call them out and expose them. The dealers may know that these middlemen are of questionable integrity, but they continue to do business with them because they are dependent upon them to fill out their inventories. If they complain to the wholesaler about a bad stamp, the wholesaler will almost certainly plead ignorance. If there is an accompanying clean cert, as in this case, some dealers may even be tempted to just pass it on.
It irritates me tremendously that we have to rely upon expertizing entities, and yet we can't really trust their certificates. They neither tell us who the examiners were nor what methods were used to examine the stamp. We don't know what findings are unequivocal, and what is uncertain. This information would be far more useful than a completely subjective numerical grade.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
655 Posts |
|
Quote:Quote:
Quote: PSE blew it.
PSAG Oops! Mooter blew it. It would be interesting to find out the 'accuracy rate' of the various expertizing entities. These examples are pretty clear, but I would expect there would be arguments over lots of other opinions that are not so clear. It would also be interesting to know the 'accuracy rate' over time. Who has gotten worse? Who has cleaned up their act? Etc. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Valued Member

United States
195 Posts |
|
rogdcam - Quote: Problem is that those lots you pointed out have new certs that preclude the lots being placed on extension. Actually, Kelleher does allow extensions on lots with PSAG certs even if they are less than 5 years old because the PSAG isn't on their lists of accepted certifying entities. The same is true for Siegel, but not for all auction houses. Policies can change abruptly, so always check the Terms and Conditions of the auction house before bidding. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 23 / Views: 610 |
|