Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Unofficial 1965 Polar Flight Cover

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 245Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1321 Posts
Posted 10/22/2021   5:15 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add GregAlex to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
This cover was flown on a round-the world polar flight (sort of) by Rockwell Corp. It contains a letter describing the flight and its purpose. But I found it interesting that there was a disclaimer rubber-stamped front and back stating "Not carried on officially authorized mail flight." Would the post office have applied this or was Rockwell required to disclaim this on the cover, since they were responsible for transporting the mail in this case?





Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
Learn More...
Australia
33621 Posts
Posted 10/22/2021   5:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Both Handstamps Unlisted in the "Air Directional Handstamps of USA " Volume 1
Pages 207-226
Author: Ian McQueen


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 10/22/2021 5:25 pm
Pillar Of The Community
3968 Posts
Posted 10/22/2021   5:42 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Listed on page 1608 of 5th edition of American Airmail Society Catalog. Their illustration show same marking, with no explanation.

Gut guess is the phrasing could have been better to say this cover *was* carried on this flight, but the flight was not an official airmail flight in terms of being done or contracted by any postal service. I.e., a privately carried letter requiring letter rate postage due to the USPS monopoly on letter mail.

(Add: when the airmail rate was more. I am surprised the USPS did not charge them the full airmail rate [as marked], for providing the courtesy cancels, but I don't know the contemporary details of the flight event.)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by John Becker - 10/22/2021 9:27 pm
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
7142 Posts
Posted 10/22/2021   9:36 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
...Unlike the Rockwell Polar Flight (1965) the covers carried by Dustin were authorized by the Civil Aeronautics Board.


Apparently this was a prerequisite for carrying actual mail.

https://americanastrophilately.com/...-low-res.pdf
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1321 Posts
Posted 10/23/2021   2:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add GregAlex to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Since this was not a CAM route, it seems like Rockwell was fudging it a little by referring to this as a singular flight. It had five stops, after all.

Also, the letter mentions that the plane returned to Burbank, so the mail really only moved between there and Palm Springs, hence no need for an airmail stamp. But then, why is it back stamped in Honolulu?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 245Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2021 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2021 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.16 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05