Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Is This An Inverted Perf Error?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 664Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...

680 Posts
Posted 12/15/2021   11:51 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add rismoney to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Looks like it was fed into a perforator 2x and one time inverted.
Thoughts?

Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
5011 Posts
Posted 12/15/2021   12:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Your question seems based on sheet-fed technology, when (correct me if I'm wrong), these would have been printed by rotary presses on roll-stock, then fed from the roll through the perforator, then cut into panes. I see no way a roll could have been fed twice in any manner.
I don't know the answer, but would seek an explanation which takes into account the printed web being a full press sheet wide (and thus symmetric), and the machine direction of travel (which perfs were added in the machine-direction and which in the cross-direction?).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
3709 Posts
Posted 12/15/2021   1:09 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jogil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
This may be from Giori Press and fed into sheet-fed L-Perforator which consisted of two rotary wheel perforators linked at right angles to each other by a conveyor belt system. Thus, if it was fed twice into the perforator, the double line perforation error would occur in both directions rather than just one.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
680 Posts
Posted 12/15/2021   4:08 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rismoney to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The following essay was originally presented in the Millenium Edition of the Linn's World Stamp Almanac, 6th Edition (2000) - Hotchner


"When a sheet in error went through half the process, it should have probably been pulled or destroyed. Instead some were probably bunched with imperforates and sent through the entire process again. Since one edge of the sheet had already been trimmed on the first pass, the sheet was out of registration by the amount trimmed when it went through a second time. Thus the doubled set of perfs is shifted an equal distance to the amount originally trimmed. "

So jogil, perhaps the sheet had no perforations running horizontally, and readded to the batch, and got the horizontal perforations, but then resulted in a doubling vertically. Sounds reasonable-ish.
Might have to form a collect of these :)



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rismoney - 12/15/2021 4:09 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2113 Posts
Posted 12/15/2021   9:00 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Parcelpostguy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
In the process of manufacturing, such should have been marked for cull and removed. This escaped the process and I assume eventually properly sold over the PO counter.

This quite an interesting item in my opinion. I would not kick it out of my collection.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 664Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2023 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2023 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.12 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05