Is A Triple Impression Considered Rare, Or Just Another Efo?

I found this pair, which had 3 each 9c impressions on each stamp.

I noticed that most double impressions are aligned much closer.

Is this truly considered a triple impression?

Would it be uncommon?

No. The two additional partial design transfers are from Tagging Ghosting.




Yes, double tagging ghosting is not common.

Edit:

I again direct you to https://www.efocc.org/Resources/Hot...AA_Cover.php for some guidance. The subject of this thread can be found in variety 57 on the listed EFOs, under Freaks.

EFO_Collector,
Gentle request. When posting images, please post an image of the entire philatelic item to provide the full context, then any closeups to emphasize the specific issue in question. Thanks so much.

Hi John Becker,

I'm using my phone to upload. When I take pictures, they're much too large to be used, even after cropping.

I found an app to cut down the file size to comply with the under 300kb rule, but it seems to have a mind of its own and re-crops on its own in a square dimension.

I'll try to make sure I retain as a square image going forward so that the whole image is provided, or let me know if you know of a good, reputable app for phones.

EFO, the "Free Image Optimizer" that is part of this forum is easily able to convert almost anything down to the 300kb limit. I also wrote a primer, which is getting a smidge out of date, at this link

https://stampsmarter.org/Learning/SCF/help1.html

Thanks Parcepostguy. Good info. Also just found out some stamps I had authenticated were misidentified there (1686o).

Thanks partime. Still, I'm using my phone, not computer, and can't find that app in the iPhone App Store