Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

China 90 Stamp Query Help Needed

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 12 / Views: 460Next Topic  
Valued Member

Australia
354 Posts
Posted 12/04/2022   02:41 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Pshann to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Hi all
Can you help identify
Perf 14
Not sure about watermark?
Thank you

Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
France
2417 Posts
Posted 12/04/2022   02:49 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add vayolene to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Most likely Michel # 268,from 1932
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Australia
354 Posts
Posted 12/04/2022   02:52 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Pshann to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks
Much appreciated
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Australia
354 Posts
Posted 12/04/2022   02:58 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Pshann to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
M 268
Wrong colour???
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
37589 Posts
Posted 12/04/2022   05:03 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Sc# C27 1940 AP3 90c Junkers F13 (separated secret mark)


Oops! was looking at the wrong character
Sc# C17 90c 1932 AP3 Junkers F13 (secret mark joined)
Olive Perf 14 is correct
CV c50c
Unwatermarked.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 12/04/2022 05:10 am
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
37589 Posts
Posted 12/04/2022   05:13 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Here is my C27
With secret mark separated.

Damage due to double perforations?

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 12/04/2022 05:14 am
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
6314 Posts
Posted 12/04/2022   07:21 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add floortrader to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I collect China Airmails ,it is one of the few areas I enjoy the designs . I believe yours is faded or wash out .
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by floortrader - 12/04/2022 10:04 am
Valued Member
United States
107 Posts
Posted 12/04/2022   9:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Just for fun to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
@floortrader,
I like your collections! Many of my were used, with some of them have multiple changes in price.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Just for fun - 12/04/2022 9:13 pm
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
37589 Posts
Posted 12/04/2022   9:35 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Just for fun,
You may wish to call "changes in price" as "Surcharges" or "surcharged"

Your bottom right hand stamp is Manchukuo (Manchuria)
It shows a locally handstamp issue in an ideogram
"Republic of China", "China Postal Service" or "temporary use for China"
Many of these local issues were also surcharged.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 12/04/2022 9:36 pm
Valued Member
Australia
354 Posts
Posted 12/05/2022   12:03 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Pshann to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks everyone for your help.
As usual, brilliant stuff!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
107 Posts
Posted 12/05/2022   07:38 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Just for fun to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
@rod222: Thanks for pointing that out!
I did not notice that the bottom right hand stamp was Manchukuo (Manchuria)
I used to have a much larger collection of stamps from Manchukuo, but most them were destroyed around 1966~1967 (the beginning of "cultural revolution") due to political incorrectness (along with stamps of Republic of China with imagines of Chiang Kai-shek
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Just for fun - 12/05/2022 07:43 am
Valued Member
United States
107 Posts
Posted 12/05/2022   07:54 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Just for fun to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
in some of my stamps, the ideograms read "postage paid for letter mailing to Japan" or "postage paid for postcard mailing to Japan", along with the surcharges.
Can anyone help me with the history of such ideograms, such as, why there were special postages for Japan at that time?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
37589 Posts
Posted 12/05/2022   4:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Can anyone help me with the history of such ideograms


Possibly compared to collecting, grains of sand on the beach.
There are a staggering amounts of differing overprints.

Not addressed in The Manchukuo Stamps Comm cancellations
(Helen K Zirkle)

You will find a huge example in "Manchukuo Stamps"
(MLO's)
Manchurian Local Overprints 24th August 2021 L Mien Po

A set of 5 Monographs?

A bewildering amount of information.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 12 / Views: 460Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2023 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2023 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.19 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05