Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 226 |
|
Valued Member
40 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
734 Posts |
|
paddle_more,
They are genuine issues.
The Stanley Gibbons catalogue refers to those perforations as 'rough' perforations.
Possible candidates: 3d, Small star watermark, rough perf 14-16, SG 16 1d and 2d, No watermark, thick toned paper, Rough perf 13, SG 22-24 or Rough perf 12.5 x 13, SG 30-31. |
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
Edited by fairdinkumstamps - 03/17/2023 02:04 am |
|
Pillar Of The Community
2597 Posts |
|
Hi paddle_more, They appear unused but examination under UV light might reveal fiscal use. As far as being genuine, they look OK to me. They're not postal stationery cutouts. The watermark would help but they look like rough perforation types, and perhaps trimmed down in places. I don't know if the stamps from the sheet margins were imperf. The Queensland chalons are one of the most interesting stamps of the Australian colonial period. Plenty of watermark, shade and perforation varieties! Hopefully this info helps some  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community

Australia
38195 Posts |
|
Pillar Of The Community
Netherlands
2673 Posts |
|
From Stanley Gibbons Commonwealth & British Empire, 2007 Edition: Quote: ... rough (rough holes, imperfectly cut, often the result of blunt pins). Quote: Pin-perforation is the commonly applied term for pin-roulette in which, instead of being punched out, round holes are pricked by sharp-pointed pins and no paper is removed. |
Send note to Staff
|
Edited by NSK - 03/17/2023 05:30 am |
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
734 Posts |
|
If someone could possibly edit the 'Queensland' in the title of this thread, that would be great. On why the 'rough' perforations look like pin perforations, the following is from Basset Hull's Queensland book in the section entitled 'Report of the Queensland Reference List Committee of the Royal Philatelic Society, London'.  |
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
Bedrock Of The Community

Australia
38195 Posts |
|
Absolutely fabulous! Finally have a reason for "rough perfs" makes complete sense, and is eloquently described. Absolutely saved under my Oz "perforations" folder Thanks guys, and thanks Basset Hull  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
734 Posts |
|
A pleasure, Rod222. Also in Basset Hull, perforation of multiple sheets at once and sticky gum in humid Queensland are also suggested as probable factors causing rough perforations. Here are some further relevant excerpts:   |
Send note to Staff
|
https://www.fairdinkumstamps.com Fair Dinkum Stamps - Specialising in stamps from early Australia and the colonies, Australian philatelic literature, catalogues, stockbooks and accessories. |
|
Valued Member
40 Posts |
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
860 Posts |
|
Quote: Also in Basset Hull, perforation of multiple sheets at once and sticky gum in humid Queensland are also suggested as probable factors causing rough perforations. I have been chasing a copy of Bassett Hull's Queensland book for decades. I have the Tasmanian and New South Wales books. Do you have the Qld Basset Hull book in soft copy? John |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
734 Posts |
|
Pillar Of The Community
2597 Posts |
|
Wonderful information! It'll make me have another look at my meagre holdings. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
860 Posts |
|
|
Replies: 12 / Views: 226 |
|