Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Roosevelt Blue 5 Cent Stamp

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 386Next Topic  
Valued Member

31 Posts
Posted 06/07/2023   04:46 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add bicken44s to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Hi everyone

I have minimal knowledge on stamps, but could someone tell me the exact year this is from? I know it's between 1922-25, really hard to tell from Stampworld as it's so confusing!
And from picture is it a 11 perforation top and bottom? Any value although I doubt it. Thank you!
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
5148 Posts
Posted 06/07/2023   08:30 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
could someone tell me the exact year this is from?

Short answer: No. Sorry.

Long answer:
As you have found, this stamp is from the definitive series of 1922, also known to some as the Fourth Bureau Issue. The series was in use until replaced by the presidential series in 1938.
During that time there were 3 major perforation varieties:
Scott 557, Perf 11, introduced in 1922
Scott 586, Perf 10, introduced in 1924, and
Scott 637, Perf 11 x 10.5, introduced in1927.
Each of these types would have remained on sale in post offices throughout the country until the local supply was used up and the next order made.

Cropping your image, placing a rotated duplicate image next the first with the perforation teeth aligned at the top red arrow, shows the teeth are mis-aligned by almost exactly half at the bottom of the column.

Although crude, since a stamp is approximately 2cm high and the perforation rate is based on a 2cm distance, it means your stamp must be one with top/side perforation rates varying by a half. Thus your stamp is Scott 637 issued in 1927 and used regularly into 1938 (and beyond) as a workhorse stamp of its era and is extremely common, worth a penny or two. It is impossible to tell the exact year of use from the generic cancel. Unused examples of this stamp are still valid for postage today.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
11888 Posts
Posted 06/07/2023   08:40 am  Show Profile Check 51studebaker's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add 51studebaker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
You can also learn more about your stamp here
https://stampsmarter.org/1847usa/19...ntifier.html
Don
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
31 Posts
Posted 06/07/2023   10:04 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add bicken44s to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Wow thank you very much, although the lingo is hard to digest, I'll definitely read the link you gave me. Appreciate it!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
11888 Posts
Posted 06/07/2023   10:36 am  Show Profile Check 51studebaker's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add 51studebaker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
A good way to learn the lingo is to lookup the terms in this Illustrated Glossary
https://stampsmarter.org/Learning/G...aryHome.html
Don
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
31 Posts
Posted 06/23/2023   03:41 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add bicken44s to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
@51studebaker hey Don, I book marked your site and spent some time absorbing information. Question, if you google "free perforation gauge" there are numerous PDF printables. Would they work and be reliable like the real gauge tool? Just like how @john_becker was showing me basically using computer pixels online, he was able to determine it wasn't the correct perforation. Also is it safe to say that all developed countries would be using rotary press, whilst third world countries or emerging economies would use the older Flat press for their stamps? I've noticed when I was organising my stamps, third world countries really had smaller stamps - I would use a 7 holder sleeve whilst, developed, I would use a 5. Is that statement somewhat correct?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 386Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2023 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2023 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.08 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05