Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.
Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Russia ,1865 , 20 Kopeek Stamp- Misprint?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 236Next Topic  
Valued Member

Bulgaria
363 Posts
Posted 06/08/2023   04:26 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add post_pe to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
This 1865 , 20 kopeek stamp possible has a error at it's bottom side. The letter infront of A is not present. Could it be considered to be a variety and is it listed in literature at all ?
Send note to Staff

Valued Member
Bulgaria
363 Posts
Posted 06/08/2023   04:28 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add post_pe to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Bulgaria
363 Posts
Posted 06/08/2023   04:29 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add post_pe to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
10762 Posts
Posted 06/08/2023   08:44 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Zagorsky lists some fairly minor varieties of this issue. He would have definitely listed a missing character after all of these decades. The stamp is damaged.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8580 Posts
Posted 06/08/2023   09:05 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I agree. It has "missing" ink all over the place.


Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Bulgaria
363 Posts
Posted 06/09/2023   04:18 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add post_pe to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I agree that it is very possible tath the surface of the paper was damaged over the long time that it changed it's ownership but it was still interesting to me hear your opinions on the stamp. Thank you.


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 236Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.


Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2023 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2023 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.06 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05