Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Register Now! It's free!
Registering will remove the anchor ads and vignette (between pages) ads.

Help Identifying USA A140 Washington 2 Cent

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 478Next Topic  
New Member
2 Posts
Posted 04/18/2025   07:57 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Vexillophile to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Hi there,

I'm trying to identify this 2 Cent washington. It believe it to be an unwatermarked 11x11 perf rotary press. Following these characteristics on a few different stamp identifying tools leads me to Scott 546, however the sizing doesn't match up which leads me to believe I have gone wrong somewhere along the line.

Hoping someone with more knowledge and skill can steer me in the right direction




Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
6156 Posts
Posted 04/18/2025   08:38 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
You are correct that you have gone down the wrong path. The lower ribbons lack the extra shading line of a type III, thus it cannot be 546. (Nor any of the offset printings, as it appears you have correctly determined.) While it may sound odd, an image of the back side is often very useful, as ink set-off from the adjacent sheet in the stack on flat plate printings is typical on the ack side of flat plate stamps, and not so with rotary.

That would leave 461 or 499. The single line watermark can be difficult to confirm when only a small portion of a letter may appear on a stamp. The odds lean heavily toward 499, without a watermark.

The straight edge at right strongly suggests a flat plate printing, either sheet or booklet format. Booklets are a different can of worms, which Scott treats poorly. Paper has a directional grain which expands/contracts differently when dampened/dried during printing. Sheets and booklets were printed with the paper turned 90 degrees from one another, thus the image area of stamps from bookets will be slightly shorter and wider than the same Scott #'d sheet stamps. Scott does not cover this adequately, so measurements can cause confusion.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by John Becker - 04/18/2025 09:14 am
New Member
2 Posts
Posted 04/18/2025   4:03 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Vexillophile to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks a lot! Very informative and helpful, I will try and determine if there is a watermark present or not
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 478Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2025 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2025 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.18 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05