Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Lot 4599 in Kelleher sale 701  
 

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
218 Posts
Posted 06/18/2017   12:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add James Drummond to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
Does this stamp look like a trimmed perforated copy to anyone else but me?

Nothing about it encourages genuineness: the ink color, the date of the cancel, the margins, etc.

Jim

p.s. Sorry, just found out that this is a duplicate post. Please ignore all comments.





http://db.kelleherauctions.com/php/...701&lot=4599
Send note to Staff
Edited by James Drummond - 06/18/2017 1:47 pm

Pillar Of The Community
2175 Posts
Posted 06/18/2017   12:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jogil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The top isn't even cut straight and the bottom shows some slight remnants of perforation holes.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
304 Posts
Posted 06/18/2017   1:39 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revenuermd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
They seem to be busy destroying any credibility that the firm once had for revenues.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page


Ron Lesher
Pillar Of The Community
938 Posts
Posted 06/18/2017   1:39 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
That stamp was discussed (debunked) in a thread a few weeks ago. See about 4 posts down the thread..
http://goscf.com/t/54643&SearchTerms=kelleher
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
112 Posts
Posted 06/18/2017   4:10 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hy-brasil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Still, we never heard what Kelleher had to say. And the other thread has 2 posts that refute it; no debunking there, in my opinion.

Color: bad original scan or a scanner doing interpretive dance here. With the heavy blur and dot at the right side, I'd expect a wash of the ink color overall. The apparent brilliant white paper is just too brilliant. The orange here is too pale and washy, not a first issue revenue color.

Kindly tell me why February 1871 is a bad date (at least, that's what it looks like to me). Were the first issues invalidated January 1st? Too late for part perfs? I'd expect legal offices to be able to use up existing stamps before buying new ones; a dollar is a dollar. Now memory kicks in: yes, 1871 is awfully late for a part perf. Troublesome to me is the cancel. It looks like it's aniline ink and that type of pencil apparently was not patented until 1877.

Quote:
The top isn't even cut straight

Not a problem by itself. Part perfs were cut apart with scissors.

Quote:
and the bottom shows some slight remnants of perforation holes

All I can see are two dents under "LA", too close together to be perf 12. What am I missing? Further the easiest starting point for a fake would be an imperf. The perfed stamp candidate would have to be a jumbo (this one is slightly wide, too), and one probably from a sheet margin.

If the perfs are genuine, the horizontal margin width should be measurable against scans of blocks. Of course, that still does not eliminate a trimmed top or bottom margin taller-than-usual perfed stamp. Can the blur and dot on this stamp give us a position?

Nonetheless, it could be a part perf but not a proven/provable part perf. The margins don't look big enough to be a R66b without question. Then the only satisfactory example would be a vertical pair. Some of you then won't like the singles passed by the PF here (last on page 2, 3rd on page 2):
http://pfsearch.org/pfsearch/pf_grd...lledfrom=lkp
In any case, if sold (rather iffy), it's going for a cert anyway.

And nobody here has mentioned the pulled perf.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by hy-brasil - 06/18/2017 7:04 pm
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
2794 Posts
Posted 06/18/2017   8:47 pm  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Apparently their auction manager completely ignored my explanation as to how the stamp cannot be genuine, as they haven't pulled the lot. I was under the impression that some other people had reported the lot to them as well. Money and ethics make strange bedfellows it would appear.

You don't even need to look at the margins. That bright color is distinctly a late state printing shade and the cancel date is 1871. Legit part perfs would be a pale reddish brown shade with a cancel date in 1863 or early 1864 at the latest.

I'd bet my pension against the stamp being genuine.


Quote:
Nonetheless, it could be a part perf but not a proven/provable part perf.


Actually, no it couldn't.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page


Edited by revenuecollector - 06/18/2017 8:53 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3680 Posts
Posted 06/18/2017   9:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
There is no possibility that this stamp is a genuine part perf. Shade, impression, cancel date, margins, and I guarantee paper are wrong. This was a perforated stamp and someone took a scissors and trimmed it top and bottom. There is zero chance of any other possibility.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
304 Posts
Posted 06/19/2017   06:53 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revenuermd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
What a delightful discussion. But it is time not to hide this discussion here on this blog. Let's get the discussion into The American Revenuer for the revenue collector audience. I am teaching a course on philatelic forgeries the day before the opening of MILCOPEX. Let's get a feature article into Linn's. The ignorance, greed, and ethics of this situation must be exposed big time.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page


Ron Lesher
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3680 Posts
Posted 06/19/2017   07:48 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The examples you mention on the last page of the PF group were examined over 50 years ago when dealers were doing the certs; they would have no chance today. Even the pairs would be heavily scrutinized and might prove problematical.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
223 Posts
Posted 06/19/2017   08:50 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add SPQR to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The Kelleher Lot has been withdrawn.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum Topics Recently Active Forum Topics
  Scott Master Canada Album
  US 3138 Imperf Bugs Pane
  Need help with Canada Pre-Stamped 8 cent 1970's Postcards collection
  Somebody got a good deal
  Swiss postage stamp scott #332
  SCF Staff Response Time?
  Is this Trinidad cancel fiscal?
  George V 'Downey Head' Perfin PDN (transatlantic PO)
  Tsarist Russia Stamps [Need Help]
  Ready to start mounting stamps
  Colour shades on newish stamps to.
  Cape of Good Hope : Stamps etc.
  Which one to choose from 3C. 1857 -61
  Spanish American War patriotics and revenue usages.
  Great Britain Scott #65?
  Bulgaria Aquatic championship 1985
  Swedsh coil scott # 319a
  UK 1971 strike post to US via France
  How do you accurately measure such small dimensions
  hole-punch or page protectors?
  Recently Acquired Examples of Scott 24
  RB1 & RB2 paper differences?
  Image Optimizer Help
  George v. Any interest
  Mexico - 5 Classic Stamps

  Isle of Man : Her Stamps on Steiner Pages.
  Zeps-king of the skies
  Great Britain : Postmarks.
  Science-Fiction/Fantasy Stamps
  Camels on stamps?
  Need help with Canada Pre-Stamped 8 cent 1970's Postcards collection
  Egyptian Themed Stamps
  Which one to choose from 3C. 1857 -61
  Recently Acquired Examples of Scott 24
  Today's challenge: spot the "better" stamp in this lot.
  Somebody got a good deal
  need help to find value and if are good or rares stamps
  Natural straight edge color lines.
  APS and ATA to Co-Host 2018 Stamp Show
  Cape of Good Hope : Stamps etc.
  Swiss postage stamp scott #332
  Value for Specimen overprint on NSW #67?
  Rare 1922 Russia #B18a major error
  US 3138 Imperf Bugs Pane
  Scott Master Canada Album
  Great Britain Scott #65?
  China : 3 items for ID
  Birds Perched, Birds Flying, Birds aground
  RB1 & RB2 paper differences?
  New Zealand Postage Due. Help with SG Number

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2017 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2014 Stamp Community Forums Go To Top Of Page
It took 0.5 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05