Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

US 572 - Capitol Hill - Something seems wrong with this one  
 

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
169 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   6:12 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add ananthveerappan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
Folks - Let me know if this stamp looks alright - Seller claims NH but doesn't offer returns.

  • The Front scan shows a bend that is not visible from the back scan

  • The Plate number fonts seem off

  • It looks like a diagonal crease on the back - not mentioned in the sale description

  • Plate# ink spreads in the back seem off





Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
1125 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   6:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add bookbndrbob to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The scanning failure creates the impression that there is a horizontal, post-printing crease on the stamp.

It appears to be careless work by the seller in presenting this image.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
1106 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   6:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The horizontal aberration which runs across above the dome is a shifting during scanning and is not a fault. But based on the diagonal mark on the reverse side, I would not buy it at any price.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by John Becker - 07/16/2017 9:17 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1622 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   6:26 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add disi123 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Is anyone sure the aberation across the face is a scanning error?

The OP has not addressed it...
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
3774 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   6:31 pm  Show Profile Check 51studebaker's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add 51studebaker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, I am sure. Note the image distortion that is occurring beyond the stamps (on the sides). The stepper motor in the scanner double clutched.
Don
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
451 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   7:30 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hy-brasil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Most definitely a typical scanner error.

The diagonal crease is a gum crease, natural and common enough for the issue. It's heavy enough that if it hasn't creased through the stamp already, it will eventually.

Sellers don't point out flaws all the time, especially on eBay. Do you do that when selling your used car or appliance, especially when you don't know a problem is present? At least the seller was good enough to show the back to let the buyer decide. Some education and due diligence is necessary on the part of potential buyers.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4722 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   7:32 pm  Show Profile Check Petert4522's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Don, I agree with your diagnosis above. Years ago I used to service video printers and have seen that happen. My question: Why did it not show on the other scan?

Peter

PS. I am very well aware of all the weird things that electronics can do. You do not have to answer this question!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
3774 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   7:53 pm  Show Profile Check 51studebaker's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add 51studebaker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Peter,
My first thought was a power issue, a situation where the power glitched during the first scan (i.e. AC power surge, USB power may have hiccupped, etc.). Old scanners used to be belt driven...but these are just guesses. We would have to know the scanner model to narrow it down a bit more.
Don
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1495 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   7:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Mike33 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
He may have just bumped the scanner while scanning and didn't notice
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
2356 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   7:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jogil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The fact that the perforations look too close together on the distorted part of the front picture but not on the back picture points to a scanner imaging problem.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by jogil - 07/16/2017 7:58 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1783 Posts
Posted 07/16/2017   9:02 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The distorted band seen on front is also on the back image, ending with the same odd perfs, but it is above the plate number.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by littleriverphil - 07/16/2017 9:05 pm
Valued Member
Netherlands
121 Posts
Posted 07/17/2017   02:38 am  Show Profile Check Dutch US Stamp Collector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Dutch US Stamp Collector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
perhaps its just me, but looks like the plate number has moved from front to back scan? its closer to the edge
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
439 Posts
Posted 07/17/2017   06:58 am  Show Profile Check srailkb's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add srailkb to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The plate number size difference (larger "14", smaller "306") is normal for F14306. All examples from that plate will show this phenomenon.

The plate number on back is an offset, rather common on these flat plate issues.

The "bend" on front is definitely a scanning aberration.

The natural gum crease on back appears to be significant (damaging the paper as well). It should have been described by the seller and will lower the value of the stamp.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
169 Posts
Posted 07/17/2017   10:08 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add ananthveerappan to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you folks...

The gum crease definitely brings down the value of this otherwise nice stamp. Great to know about that Plate Number and Ink Offset variance.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum TopicsRecently Active Forum Topics
  Can anyone indentify this please. Can't find anything!
  Rare 2nd copy found of 6C LARGE QUEEN to prove constancy of transfer roll.
  Lifetime stamp collector desperately seeking professional philatelic advice ...
  Germany overprinted Scott 196, 196b. 1922 20m Plowing
  Has the USPS stopped cancelling stamps?
  Russia with a WM I cannot ID
  Fools rush in..... to buy dreck
  Has Anyone Dealt with Status International
  45th Annual Garden State Stamp & Cover Show
  Canada Saeled Match Sets Questions
  hi can anyone help me identify this?
  Overview of minimum sizes for coils and imperforate stamps
  Interesting precancel types and oddities
  China 1949 Dr. Sun Yat-Sen
  Palo US Revenue Hingeless Albums?
  Treasure Hunting on eBay?
  New Brunswick 8i - worth it ???
  Australian Postage Dues - CTO?
  Kasimir Bileski Writings
  Mint Sheets Between 1975 and 1992
  Stamp Collecting, The News Of It's Death Are Greatly Exaggerated.
  Dealer Certification Policies
  Rights of Women cinderella
  Greenland Cinderellas
  Incorrect PF Cert, Not Plate 4 - #20 TII

  Children's Drawings
  2014 Scott WW Catalog Set Minus Vol 5 Wanted
  Lifetime stamp collector desperately seeking professional philatelic advice ...
  The oldest known precancel
  Wiki'd Buildings on Stamps
  Geisha and Japanese costume postcards
  Show Your Newly Acquired Covers Here
  Has the USPS stopped cancelling stamps?
  Overview of minimum sizes for coils and imperforate stamps
  Let's see your most recently purchased stamps
  Question on use of "old" stamps for current mailings......
  Australian Postage Dues - CTO?
  The Chicago Exchange Preferred cancel?
  Interest in perfin's?
  Can anyone indentify this please. Can't find anything!
  Treasure Hunting on eBay?
  Stamp Collecting, The News Of It's Death Are Greatly Exaggerated.
  Non-advertising Prexie Covers
  US Coast Guard Eagle 14c, postcard used?
  Rare 2nd copy found of 6C LARGE QUEEN to prove constancy of transfer roll.
  Fools rush in..... to buy dreck
  Has Anyone Dealt with Status International
  White's Encyclopedia of the Colors of US Postage Stamps
  Germany overprinted Scott 196, 196b. 1922 20m Plowing
  Christmas Around the World 2017

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2017 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2005 - 2017 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.79 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05