Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

BI-METAL corrosion on bicolor plates ...  
 

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Valued Member

Canada
14 Posts
Posted 09/13/2017   11:27 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add bicolor1875 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Message
the inorganic ink compounds caused wear on cliches and many plates; as well as damage to perforator pins .

in england, Royal Mail moved to organic inks.
Send note to Staff

Valued Member
Denmark
233 Posts
Posted 09/13/2017   3:31 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Sorsh to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
welcome to the forum Mack Strathdee!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1937 Posts
Posted 09/13/2017   5:03 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
the inorganic ink compounds caused wear on cliches and many plates; as well as damage to perforator pins .


Hi and

Could you show us what you are referring to on a stamp, please? I understand the ink wear on the clichés and plates, but the damage to the perforator pins has me mystified.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by littleriverphil - 09/13/2017 5:05 pm
Valued Member
Denmark
233 Posts
Posted 09/14/2017   12:41 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Sorsh to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
there's no need, because it's not correct.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1937 Posts
Posted 09/14/2017   07:59 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Denmark
233 Posts
Posted 09/14/2017   1:35 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Sorsh to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Certain Colorblends could turn acidic and cause wear - yes

But the main wear comes from the repeated pressure, and cleaning of the plates/cliches

Some blends Would contain higher percentage of metals which would harden faster and require excessive cleaning,

I Can of course back this with evidense if required..
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1937 Posts
Posted 09/14/2017   4:12 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
In keeping the topic on bicolored stamps, it seems the different minerals in the inks colors cause varying rates of wear. Your study of the Danish Bi Colors posted not long ago was very interesting. Did you find that frame and vignette plates wore at different rates?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by littleriverphil - 09/14/2017 4:13 pm
Valued Member
Denmark
233 Posts
Posted 09/15/2017   10:12 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Sorsh to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

It's quite evident that the lower and top rows wore down faster than the rest.
the evidense of this is that most commonly the lower row has been disgarded and the plate shifted downwards and a new row has been inserted in the top (or simply exchanged)

a newly discussed area is the spacing between the ovalband and the ovalline has recieved a re-engraving resulting in a new series of "ovalflaws" referred to as "free way" (wider spacing than normal).

my theory in the discussion was that this is caused by hardening paint getting stuck and thus causing the space to "fill" with paint and a cleaning to be needed - this was done with a sharp instrument, slightly wider than the space - causing the space to widen while cleaning.

and my suggestion was that these new kind of ovalflaws most commonly would have migrated from the bottom row to new positions in later printings.
they suddenly appear in printings with 10-20 more or less obvious flaws, and then disappear as clichés are thrown away - earlier printingscolors would, in my oppinion, have had a blend that either hardened fast, or a higher concentration of metallic minerals.

most disgarded this, and I invited them to prove me wrong - Lasse Nielsen (most regarded expert) took this work on and found there was indeed a link.


i'll show examples later this weekend.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Denmark
233 Posts
Posted 09/15/2017   1:28 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Sorsh to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
the inorganic ink compounds caused wear on cliches and many plates; as well as damage to perforator pins .


the notion that ink compounds causes damage to perforator pins is, in addition to alot of other things you post on other forums, complete gibberish.

stamps are printed, and gummed before perforated. and would have had to be dry before this process as multiple sheets were perforated in one go.

so for this to hold any truth, the paint would have to act as an armor so perforator pins would break off in contact with it?

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5040 Posts
Posted 09/15/2017   2:22 pm  Show Profile Check Petert4522's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I do not mean any disrespect, but I disagree with most of the above. Long ago, back in the eighties tha USPS found that the tagging ink applied to their coil stamps was eroding the perforator pins excessively. Hence they started to introduce block tagging.
Later, with the introduction of modified inks the use of block tagging ceased. In the original taggant a metallic ingredient caused the erosion.

Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Denmark
233 Posts
Posted 09/15/2017   2:53 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Sorsh to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
First an example of how the wear shows on stamps in the lower 10th row.. the same happens to stamps in the top row.

this stamp is a quite expressive, not all stamps are as apparent from the lower row, and on a few stamps you can't tell the bottom row apart from the rest.



the "smear" i'm referring to as "stuck down" paint is also evident on this stamp

here's a regular somewhat boring 8øre



here's one that has had it's "spacing" between the ovalband, and the oval line.



compare the spacing of the 2 stamps and it's rather obvious.
to me, it's quite likely that the re engraved oval would have been placed in the positions that either recieved the most pressure, or in a print where the paint contained a higher concentration of metallic minerals.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Denmark
233 Posts
Posted 09/15/2017   2:56 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Sorsh to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I do not mean any disrespect, but I disagree with most of the above. Long ago, back in the eighties tha USPS found that the tagging ink applied to their coil stamps was eroding the perforator pins excessively. Hence they started to introduce block tagging.
Later, with the introduction of modified inks the use of block tagging ceased. In the original taggant a metallic ingredient caused the erosion.


none taken, by long ago, 80's do you mean 1880's or 1980's?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5040 Posts
Posted 09/15/2017   3:06 pm  Show Profile Check Petert4522's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Neither tagging nor the USPS did exist in the 1880's so I meant the 1990's.

Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Denmark
233 Posts
Posted 09/15/2017   3:28 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Sorsh to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
but this thread is on bi coloured stamps from denmark 100 years before this the proces was completely different.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1937 Posts
Posted 09/15/2017   5:19 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Sounds like you've 'met' the op somewhere else.
How often were the plates thoroughly cleaned of dried inks? A weekly cleaning? Sounds like the printer walked a fine line between ink buildup, and wear.

"Just regular somewhat boring 8 ore".
Beautiful stamps. Thank you for the illustration of ink cause plate wear.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by littleriverphil - 09/15/2017 5:20 pm
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum TopicsRecently Active Forum Topics
  Chickens, Hens & Roosters on stamps
  Ice Hockey on Stamps
  Regency Superior Redux? Mossgreen Auctions
  Scott to Stanley Gibbons Catalog Number Cross Reference
  Stanley Gibbons Commonwealth and British Empire 1840 - 1952 Catalog Question
  Another Turkey stamp I can't idenify.
  Need help identifying these stamps.
  Jan. 19 QUIZ: How's Your Eye for Detail?
  Need help identifying this stamp please
  1966 Matthew Flinders Plate Varieties
  Frank-less telegraph stamp
  How many 1840-1900 pages are in the Scott International 1840-1940 section?
  Well... that's certainly an interesting antitheft approach.
  C1 - Oxidized - Go or No-Go?
  Baden silver grey 1 Kreuzers
  What's The Freak On This Block?
  What's the best way to sell a lot of P Stamps?
  Marlborough Massachusetts Stamp Show
  Using light instead of fluid to detect watermarks
  Is this a Cilicia stamp?
  I have my first USA stamp catalogue - brace yourselves :)
  Funny french cancells
  The perils of a postman, German style
  Korea Stamp Society Now Defunct
  Many auction items ... Press Sheets and Regular Sized Sheets

  Chickens, Hens & Roosters on stamps
  Stanley Gibbons Commonwealth and British Empire 1840 - 1952 Catalog Question
  Regency Superior Redux? Mossgreen Auctions
  Anthony's LLC Disminal PF Report Card = Follow Up to 10/23/17 Discussion
  green halfpenny King Edward stamps
  Need help identifying these stamps.
  Another Turkey stamp I can't idenify.
  Ice Hockey on Stamps
  Stamps cancelled with pen squiggles
  Large Guns: Cannons, etc
  Ebay Lot So Bad I Am Speechless
  Scott to Stanley Gibbons Catalog Number Cross Reference
  To Renew or Not to Renew Membership? That is the Question.
  How many 1840-1900 pages are in the Scott International 1840-1940 section?
  Money stamps
  1966 Matthew Flinders Plate Varieties
  Well... that's certainly an interesting antitheft approach.
  Bare Feet on Stamps ' , ' , ' , '
  What Did You Do Philatelically: Today or Recently?
  How do you display your postal History?
  Norway, WW2 "London" printings
  Is this a Cilicia stamp?
  Canadian 'Admiral' Lathework printings
  What's the best way to sell a lot of P Stamps?
  Canadian Revenues Valuations

Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2018 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2005 - 2018 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.84 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05