Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Stamp Community Forum
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

US Gutter pairs of Benjamin Franklin one cent green and George Washington 2 cent carmine  
 

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
United States
125 Posts
Posted 04/20/2017   08:43 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Lioness2 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi littleriverPhil. yes, I did and both are 3mmm.in width above.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1867 Posts
Posted 04/20/2017   08:50 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Ah, thought so, the center margin looked wider the margins on the outer sides of the pairs.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
125 Posts
Posted 04/20/2017   10:03 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Lioness2 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
That is why when I viewed them I had considered them gutters due to width being larger than normal pairs. It can be also viewed in the visual comparison with the "Harding pairs". The width is larger than the pair he has in his possession too.
Thank you for your great observation. I have been told in past, they are special stamps.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1867 Posts
Posted 04/20/2017   10:11 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It is odd, they are listed as 3mm but have no sub lettering or numbers.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
893 Posts
Posted 04/20/2017   8:25 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The #343 pair, with 3mm spacing, is from a "Star" plate, from the outer 6 rows on the sheet of 100. There were issues with shrinkage causing miss-perforation with the 3rd. bureau issues. They were first issued with uniform 2mm spacing, which was deemed unsatisfactory (causing miss-perforation issues, causing too much waste). These first plates were plate numbered along with the Bureau of Engraving and Printing logo. The spacing was changed to 3mm for the outer 6 rows and 2mm for the 4 inner rows on each of the 100 (10x10 rows) sheets in the 4 sheet printing format. This change was given a small open star, plate number, and bureau logo. There is also one sheet of #343 from plate #4980 with a small solid star that has the same spacing as stated above. This spacing caused problems for the private vending and affixing machine manufacturers who required equal spacing between rows on unperforated sheet stamps to work in their machines. Finally a 2.75mm even spacing was used. These sheets had an "A", followed by the plate number then the Bureau logo. As the first plates and the stared plates were retired, the remaining plate produced with 2.75mm spacing dropped the "A" from the plate number. The "A" plates were not used for #343; they were used on #383. I think I got this right. If not, someone with correct me.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Al E. Gator - 04/20/2017 8:27 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1867 Posts
Posted 04/20/2017   11:07 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Whew! As if W/F issues aren't complicated enough! So, ideally one would want strips showing both 2 mm and 3 mm margins. Easier to find the star plate number.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
125 Posts
Posted 04/20/2017   11:48 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Lioness2 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Excellent information Al. I do believe your information is correct from what I read in the past. Thank you for sharing it in the forum.
Below are other photographs I would like to share with the room pertaining to 3 mm and 2mm differences.
This is a block of 6 Washington 332's that are also 3mms as well. I always look at the perforations carefully between stamps with the Scott's 332's. If you line them up on a 2mm, they are not the same width size. The perforations are not directly in the middle between stamps. In the block of 6, in the top margin is also have the pin holes.
The Benjamin Franklin block of 4 also came along with the collection of unused stamps.



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
236 Posts
Posted 04/21/2017   12:00 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Rhett to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Those are not sheet stamps, they are booklet stamps. Therefore they are not blocks of 331 and 332 but booklet panes or portions thereof.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
125 Posts
Posted 04/21/2017   12:02 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Lioness2 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you Rhett for the clarification
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
125 Posts
Posted 04/21/2017   12:15 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Lioness2 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The perforations start from top of margin down. Stamps from booklets show this. I just thought I would share some examples of perforation differences.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!United States Postal Service, Now on eBay!
New Forum TopicsRecently Active Forum Topics
  2017 Chicagopex revenue acquisitions. Part 1: stamps (MANY IMAGES)
  Do You Like KGV or Roos in Multiples Too?
  Need help with this Havanna (sp) AL Cover and 3 cent Plate 0 usage
  Ad banner problem with Stamps Catalogue
  Washington-Franklin coil pairs from my recent project now on eBay
  Rare China 1897 Scott # 33 BL 8c On 6c PSE VG 50 MNH Hong Kong/Taiwan
  Aomic Bombs End WWII labels; look like US 1995 50th anniversary of WWII stamps
  Dual-sided & perked U.S. Customs Form w Serial No.not found online or in U.S. Scott Specialized
  2018 Newfoundland Specialized Catalogue
  Help with valuation of Newfoundland NFR2 & NFR3
  Slovakia - 2017 new issues:
  My profile photo - how to add it:
  Are These 2 Stanps Belgian Precancels?
  Compound perforations and control perfin on Schermack/Scott #392
  KGVI Black bars question
  10 cent Virgin Island Revenue Stamp circa 1958
  Airmail "Stamps" help
  Norway potato rationing instructions from WW2
  Strange Hinge Style, Any Info?
  Ukraine 1918 cover from Odessa
  Is this a 17 can someone help
  Azerbaijan to USA cover
  Nov. 24 QUIZ: How's Your Eye for Detail?
  Are these stamps authentic?
  Show your Commonwealth KGVI era and pictorial sets

  1c 1851 Plate 1-Early Stamps
  KGVI Black bars question
  Aomic Bombs End WWII labels; look like US 1995 50th anniversary of WWII stamps
  Norway potato rationing instructions from WW2
  2017 Chicagopex revenue acquisitions. Part 1: stamps (MANY IMAGES)
  I inherited my Uncle's huge collection of stamps, thought you might enjoy seeing some of it
  Hanukkah stamps issued today (November 14th) and immediately recalled
  The Stamps of Australia : On Steiner Pages.
  German Perfin Catalog
  Barbed Wire
  Update to the unique 1938 cracked plate series
  Please Help to Identify Japanese Revenues & Documents 1890's?
  Show us your Turkey's on stamps
  Let's see your most recently purchased stamps
  John Ash Imprints - show Yours
  Today's mystery - E.E.B. overprint
  Ad banner problem with Stamps Catalogue
  Compound perforations and control perfin on Schermack/Scott #392
  Coil Test Strips
  Do You Like KGV or Roos in Multiples Too?
  Chart for Homemade Steiner Pages
  old japanese stamps used.
  Need help with this Havanna (sp) AL Cover and 3 cent Plate 0 usage
  Australian Specimen Stamps
  Japanese Revenue - Any info appreciated!

Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2017 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2005 - 2017 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.58 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05