Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

My Newest Revenue Finds

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 5,148Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1721 Posts
Posted 11/20/2010   11:06 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revstampman to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I can't explain how hey got there. Maybe from the document they were on. But, that is the correct paper for he early days of the 1st issue. Almost all of the 1st issue imperf's are on the same thin paper.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2480 Posts
Posted 11/20/2010   1:25 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tomiseksj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I guess I'll soak it awhile and see if they float off.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6432 Posts
Posted 12/10/2010   09:02 am  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Chiming in as my first post here.

It is doubtful that they are true silk papers. The paper type looks like the early thin paper; it doesn't have the right color or consistency for a silk paper, in my opinion. Also, any supposed silk paper with a cancel date prior to mid-1870 should immediately be suspect. While some documents were in fact backdated for legal reasons, they are by far the exception rather than the rule.

I've seen far too many "silk papers" in dealer stocks that were either (1) pieces of something stuck to the back, or (2) bits of wood pulp/fiber rather than actual silk threads.

Also, as I found out the hard way, a blue thread does NOT automatically mean silk paper:

http://www.revenue-collector.com/pages/1670.html

I find that a USB microscope is excellent for seeing whether a thread is truly woven into the stamp or simply stuck to the back (I linked the image rather than posted it because it is a huge image):

http://www.revenue-collector.com/st...rcloseup.jpg

-Dan
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2480 Posts
Posted 12/11/2010   10:06 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tomiseksj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Dan,

Thanks for the info and welcome to the forum.

As you can tell from this and other posts, I'm new to revenues and have alot to learn. By the way, I think your website provides a great reference resource.

Thus far I've been using a high-resolution scan to try to check the fibers but after seeing your USB microscope image, it is clear that I'll need to go that route.

Steve
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 19 / Views: 5,148Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.16 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05