Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Australia : 1937 Kg6 Seek Opinions.

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 3,062Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
Australia
312 Posts
Posted 04/08/2011   11:30 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add MmmmBalf to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
There are 2 states of Die I. Die I White Wattles, and Die I. The White Wattles as has been mentioned was caused by the use of unsatisfactory ink in the first printing.

With the White Wattles, the T and A are pronouncedly joined, not just joined. The King's ear is mostly unshaded. But the real tip with the White Wattles that hasn't been mentioned is that there are two frame breaks on the inner left frame - one about level with the epaulette on the King's shoulder and one between the lower lip and chin.

Here is an image of a White Wattles (borrowed from another site - I disposed of a lot of my Aussie collection to concentrate on Victoria. )



You can see the 2 frame breaks on the inner left frame - look about 6 lines up from the left numeral 3, and up again for the next one.

Die I is the same die, just better ink. This cleared up the wattles, the King's ear is better but the chin still undefined. The T & A are joined to a lesser extent.

Retouching the copper plates led to Die Ia. The T & A are separated - the T tapers at the lower end - on the same angle as the slope of the A.

Die II was a re-cutting of Die I on a new transfer of the original die. POSTAGE was re-engraved to appear even and the King's chin was strengthened by a continuous line.

Die III was a completely new die. It's identified by the longer epaulette at right.

Hope this helps!

Balf
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Be yourself. Everyone else is taken.
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 04/09/2011   04:22 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Great stuff!
Thanks MmmmBalf.
...and thanks to everybody else that assisted.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2027 Posts
Posted 04/13/2011   10:56 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jubilee to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I think this is a Die 1a, opinions would be appreciated!

TA is seperated





Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 04/14/2011   01:06 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I'll commit myself with the affirmative.
The second proof is missing (the slant on the "T")
but basically, if the "T" and the "A" are not joined,
then one looks at the chin, and if the outline is broken
(as yours with 4 strokes) then it must be a Die 1a.


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5894 Posts
Posted 04/22/2011   6:43 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add smauggie to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Folks,

Are mine white enough? I think maybe so, but render my stamps for judgment. Do be gentle.



Answered my own question. These are Die 1a (not the original white wattles). Still a significant premium over later dies.

This website was extremely helpful. http://blueowlsstamps.com.au/vPages...%20KVI%20era

Note the tapered T.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by smauggie - 04/22/2011 6:55 pm
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 04/22/2011   7:18 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yep, the one on the RHS is most easily recognised as
slanting "T", the centre one, not so.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5894 Posts
Posted 04/22/2011   7:33 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add smauggie to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the confirmation Rod. The one on top was just for contrast. The two beneath are a connected pair.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 3,062Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.27 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05