| Author |
Replies: 822 / Views: 74,814 |
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1815 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1328 Posts |
|
|
Here is a nice one that I got today. it is position 2L9. Neinken did not plate this position. I wonder what kind of grade this would get. Would they take into account the small spacing between the vertical stamps? It showed a PF cert as a pair 2L9---12L9, with a small tear at bottom of 12L9. I am guessing that was why it was separated.  Here is the cert they posted for this stamp. I wish they would have not cut the top.  |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by jaxom100 - 08/03/2026 11:28 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3513 Posts |
|
|
Pretty stamp.
For grading, it might be centered a bit low - but I am no grading expert, nor do I care to be. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10785 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
143 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
143 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3513 Posts |
|
|
Neat cover.
I have one with a single #9 on each use; with yours it looks like the original cover sat around for a bit before being reused.
You find a lot of these with Confederate postal history. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community

United States
1111 Posts |
|
|
Very nice. But ... There are only 30 days in April, so unlikely this would be from April 31, 1861. Any chance it could be Aug 31, 1861? If so, this could be a demonetized use, making it even more special.  Here's an Aug 30, 1861 demonetized cover from Chicago that got a rare ""Old Stamps/Not recognized" handstamp and sold for $10,000. https://bennettstamps.com/php/lot_a...297&lot=3056 |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3513 Posts |
|
|
Good eye. It would need such a handstamp(old stamps) in order to be worth big money, but demonetized uses are certainly quite collectible.
Its hard to make out dates… |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
145 Posts |
|
|
Hey everyone. Could I chalk this 24 up as a Type Va, ergo being a "type V with less trimming"? I tried searching on here and on Siegel hoping to find others that show more scrollwork, particularly at the bottom, but couldn't find anything that matches. I'd also like to know about the smearing going on. Has it been over-inked?   |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
143 Posts |
|
|
ZebraMan and TxStamps, that would be very interesting if it was from 31 August as you note. The Detroit CDS appears legible enough to at least have 31 as a day, and an A for the first letter in the month. You are right that I forgot to account that April only has 30 days. I am going to look into it more. There is a cover guy I like to chat with I will show this cover to next time I meet with him. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1815 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Could I chalk this 24 up as a Type Va solomon, you have a straddle-pane Type V here, positions 100L10 (partial stamp at left) and 91R10. Ink smears, bruises and other extraneous colorations are not uncommon on Type V stamps of this design. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 822 / Views: 74,814 |
|