Bundi Sacred Cows Issue - Forgery Or Genuine?

Hello!
I have a set of the sacred cows Bundi stamps in my collection, but I am not sure how a genuine stamp would look like...The paper of most of the stamps is slightly yellowish and thick. Three stamps (1/4, 2 and 8) have a much thinner paper which makes them appear more fragile. The black and red stamp on the top are different as well, but look more clearly fake to me.



Are these more thick paper variants the products of the infamous Allahabad forgers?

Close up of the a stamp that I think might be genuine:





Close up of a stamp that I suspect to be a forgery:

According to the Serrane Guide of Forgeries "specialty catalogs must be consulted". Here is one reference:



There is a philatelic library in Munich; you could check there. There are several other publications for Bundi which may be of use but the one I noted is specific for forgeries.

study of these stamps:
https://www.anglo-indian-affairs.co...Handbook.pdf

Top row - the first half anna black looks like an Allahabad forgery to me. The 1 anna red looks genuine. Next row - the quarter anna blue and the two annas green are genuine. Bottom row - 8 annas orange is genuine.
I don't like the look of the rest, but if the one you have shown from the back is typical, these are not Allahabad forgeries, as the one you show does appear to be typographed.
There were some forgeries that appeared in Bundi's actual stamp stock, and these may be from that source, and therefore definitely collectible. I will look for some illustrations of these to compare.

Sorry for the delay in adding an image.
Here is an image of a sheet of the Bundi Type 1 forgeries.
If you look closely at yours, they share some of the characteristic flaws visible in each cliché.
I am confident that those I identified above are the Type 1 forgeries, which date from 1923 and are probably scarcer than the genuine stamps.

Thank you @perf12, and @Germania for your suggestions and thank very much @peter for your efforts! This was very valuable information for me. (I am sorry for my extreme late reply)

If my source is correct, the Forgery 1 should be "[...] 3/4 mm shorter and have a longer top inscription."
(https://www.anglo-indian-affairs.co...-Reprint.pdf ).

It seems that the design frame on the suspected F1 specimens is smaller than on the presumed originals, although I'm not yet sure whether this also relates to the spacing between the frame and the perforation lines. The top inscriptions are indeed longer, but so are the bottom inscriptions.

If I get another Bundi material in the future, I'll take a closer look at all of these details again. Your theory seems very plausible to me. Thank you very much for pointing this out!

In the meantime, I'll do some more research into the different printings, paper types that were used. The Indian Feudatory States are a philaletic paradise. I love it! hehehe