Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Scanner Settings

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 4,072Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6430 Posts
Posted 01/01/2012   10:24 am  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I scan stamps at 1200dpi, entire documents at 600dpi. If I'm wanting to grab particular flyspecks or other varieties, I'll occasionally scan up to 2400dpi. If I want to get fibre detail, I use a USB microscope.

I find that a black background gives better framing and more accurate color than white. If I'm scanning for long-term archival, I'll scan with my scanner lid up, creating a texture-free black background. If I'm doing quick-and-dirty for ebay, I'll scan in white sales card.

Experiment with the TWAIN (scanner software) settings. Some of the worst problems I've seen with other people's scans that make me cringe every time I see them:

1. Auto-sharpening cranked up too high. This creates horrible edge artifacts.









2. Auto-contrast and auto-color can be BAD, depending on how the maker implements them. They blow out the highlights and you lose all surface texture/detail.







3. When saving an image, don't try to save file size be overcompressing the image; it results in ugly artifacts.




You're better off scanning with all enhancements turned off, and then tweaking in Photoshop or other image manipulation software.

A couple of my scans, showing both black and white backgrounds:



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by revenuecollector - 01/01/2012 10:28 am
Valued Member
United States
302 Posts
Posted 01/01/2012   7:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add panda.bear to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Great examples revenuecollector - the most frequent scanning faux pas I see are over-sharpening and underexposing shadow and mid-range areas. My general rule is - if the piece begins looking different than it does in person, you need to look at your settings!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
62 Posts
Posted 01/02/2012   1:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Chief.Fontenot to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I would say that 600 dpi is a very acceptable level of scan for stamps. When I scan my pages into my computer that puts each page at about 102mb. Then when extracted stamp by stamp they are around 1mb each and I can see almost every detail I can see in my microscope with 10xWF eyepieces and 40x lenses. I mostly use my scope fro coins since they don't scan as well, but I have found some uses with my stamps as well. especially for weeding out those pesky Russian made fakes I have been finding in my fancy cancel purchases.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 4,072Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.12 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05