Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1765 Stamp Act Revenue Stamps

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 20 / Views: 6,057Next Topic
Page: of 2
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 09/20/2017   8:52 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
752 Posts
Posted 09/24/2017   6:56 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add funcitypapa to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The above discussion suggests that a document bearing a stamp act revenue stamp actually used in America as opposed to British commonwealth would be especially rare and valuable
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10761 Posts
Posted 09/24/2017   7:36 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
They are. One created and used here (Florida), and one created in Jamaica and then used here (also in Florida).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1855 Posts
Posted 10/20/2017   10:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add GregAlex to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
In 1765 Florida had only been in British hands for two years. Essentially the only population base was St. Augustine, is that correct?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
324 Posts
Posted 10/23/2017   6:59 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add lukusw to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I too have never seen the actual wordage. Thank you Revcollector for the information. This is fascinating and I can see how this would infuriate the colonists.

My favorite part:

"And there shall be also paid, in the said colonies and plantations, a duty of six pence for every twenty shillings, in any sum not exceeding fifty pounds sterling money, which shall be given, paid, contracted, or agreed for, with, or in relation to, any clerk or apprentice, which shall be put or placed to or with any master or mistress, to learn any profession, trade, or employment.

II

And also a duty of one shilling for every twenty shillings, in any sum exceeding fifty pounds, which shall be given, paid, contracted, or agreed for, with, or in relation to, any such clerk or apprentice..."

So, basically if you paid someone as a regular employee, you were taxed in proportion to their salary. I guess the assumption was if you paid someone more to do a job, it meant they were generating more revenue for you (i.e. indirect business revenue taxation).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 20 / Views: 6,057Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.17 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05