I took a look at the website.
I admire the desire to document listings of incorrectly described stamps.
I am unsure though how often it is referenced on a daily basis by online buyers?
My main concern is that, in most of the entries that I looked at, only providing a link to an
ebay page is only useful for three months or so.
After that, the images are gone, and after a bit longer, the listing itself is simply no longer available.
So the reader is left with an old criticism that was written about a particular item that they can no longer view, to perhaps reach a conclusion of their own.
Once the percentage of "corrected" lots by the sellers are compared, the end result seems to be that some sellers are on top of things, and some are not.
Maybe the overall intent is disclose those in the latter category? I don't know.
At least here, I at least post the image
and the link and/or any relevant text from the lot listing.
The end result is to hopefully educate and entertain, and also to perhaps warn other collectors what to look out for, from some certain sellers.
Lastly, I don't know what posting this particular item under discussion in the website would accomplish in the future, seeing as how the seller has zero feedback, and may or may not be around in the future.
All this being said, I might see what I can do to list questionable items both here, and at Don's website.
Jim