We'll have to agree to disagree. Your many comments on this board reflect deep experience and knowledge, but here IMO you are ascribing a new definition to a term that is pretty precise. I am not aware of any catalog or philatelic writer referring to type variant pairs as se-tenant issues. But I'm probably nitpicking so let's move on.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Privacy Policy / Terms of UseAdvertise Here